Drag site icon to your taskbar to pin site. Learn More

2012 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO First Ride

Monday, August 29, 2011


Videos Our Sponsor
2012 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO - First Ride Video
Click to view video
MotoUSA unwraps Ducati's new Monster 1100EVO on the streets of Southern California in the 2012 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO - First Ride Video.
The first time I laid my eyes on a Ducati Monster I was still in high school and immediately fell in love with the stripped down, no-nonsense design. The naked trellis frame and stubby stance resonated with me as the bike that was cool because there were so many who didn’t think it was. Nineteen years later and Ducati is still producing the now iconic model, so I wasn’t the only one who thought it was cool. The latest version of the Monster is the 1100 EVO, and I finally get to throw a leg over my favorite Ducati I never rode.

The EVO treatment consists of upgraded components and higher performance. The Monster EVO features the first Desmodue twin-valve powerplant with a claimed triple-digit horsepower output thanks to revised cylinder heads with reworked intake tracts, more valve lift (4% for the intake and 5% for the exhaust) and a bumped up compression ratio of 11.3 from 10.7 to 1. Soon after we got the 1100 in our hands we rolled it up on the MotoUSA Dynojet 200i where it pumped out 86.69 horses and 65.93 lb-ft of torque. Not quite the claimed 100 from Ducati, but still an impressive showing for an air-cooled, two-valve Twin.

On the mean streets of Irvine the power output is robust but not really monstrous, especially after stepping off any literbike or even a supersport. The punch from the Monster 1100 EVO comes on down low and builds quickly before signing off abruptly just north of 8000 rpm. More than a few
2012 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO First Ride
2012 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO First Ride
2012 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO First Ride
wheelies were foiled by this overly aggressive throttle cut. Bagging up on the rev-limiter was a common occurrence until I learned to short-shift the Ducati.

The torque curve on the 1100 EVO is fairly flat before it peaks at 5900 rpm and you can feel every pulse through the rather tall gearbox. On the freeway in top gear the engine lugs along at around 4000 rpm, which imparts too much vibration to the handlebars, seat and footpegs. Going down just a couple teeth on the rear sprocket would smooth the highway manners considerably. Working around the tall gearing in the curves is as easy as riding in a gear lower than usual. It’s a balancing act, however, as you only have around a 4000 rpm spread to play with. After I retrained my left foot and right wrist to play in that narrow powerband, the EVO and I were fast friends blasting around Southern California.

A fully adjustable 43mm Marzocchi inverted fork is matched with a Sachs rear shock with pre-load and rebound adjustability to keep the Monster EVO in contact with the road. The ride is supple in the city, dealing with potholes and rain gutters admirably. On the freeway the ride is comfortable on even the bumpiest stretch of the I-5, and on the mountain curves the suspension is settled and smoother than the red paint on the Ducati’s tank.

Steering on the 1100 EVO is light and quick with a 64-degree total steering angle that gives it an almost dirtbike-ish feel. Popping in and out of traffic and negotiating the tightest of city streets is a breeze on the Monster, and that is where it's really at home. When doing duty in the curves, handling is crisp and effortless. Just about anyone would feel like a seasoned pro on the Ducati. It’s not that you're going that fast, but it feels like it. Every movement and correction is met with a precise response.

The Monster 1100 EVO’s wonderful cornering prowess has a trade off on the interstate, however, as on the freeway the front end is busy and borderline nervous. A constant wiggle comes from the bars as the front tire follows rain grooves and seams, and any gust of wind or turbulence from a nearby tractor-trailer makes the shimmy even worse. This condition is frustrating, but you’ll forget all about it the minute you reach your favorite winding road. A steering stabilizer would be a must have if you were planning on using the Monster on the freeway frequently.

It’s a shame that the long distance riding is compromised by the flighty front-end, because the cockpit would allow for extended stints. The handlebars have been raised 20mm for a more neutral upright seating position that negates a

The Duc features a rather tall gearbox that takes some getting use to.
considerable amount of strain on the back and nether region. Combined with a comfortable reach to the footpegs, the rider compartment is easy on these old-bones.

The Monster’s now standard safety pack incorporates a version of Ducati’s DTC traction control system and ABS brakes. Whereas the 1198 superbike has eight levels of traction control, the Monster 1100 EVO has just four. But in reality it is all it needs as half the horsepower will break loose the Pirelli Diablo Rosso II rear tire. Unless you are in the rain or on a seriously dusty road, the least amount of babysitting from level one is all that is needed. Anything above that and the traction control kicks in too early and too abruptly.

Pulling the Monster down from speed is a joy and the ABS system is not too intrusive. The four-piston Brembo calipers gripping the 320mm front rotors have a solid bite and excellent feel. The rear is a little more vague, but above par as expected from Brembo.

After admiring the Monster for nearly two decades my first ride on the 2012 Monster 1100 EVO met my expectations in just about every area. With each redesign the Monster looks cooler than the last, and the great part is that it doesn’t cost a dime more at $11,995. As an around-the-town bike that can shred canyons when the mood strikes, the Monster is a Ducati you can live with every day. That is as long as you stay away from the freeway.
2012 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Slideshow
Recent Street Bike Reviews
2015 Ducati Scrambler First Ride
Positioned as a gateway model, Ducati’s Scrambler impresses with its simple, fun-loving character. Our Road Test Editor files his report from California’s Palm Springs.
2015 MV Agusta Stradale 800 First Ride
Our man Melling takes MV Agusta's Stradale 800 for a spin and finds a surprisingly competent sports touring motorcycle that may be the most important bike MV has ever produced.
Hesketh 24 First Ride Review
MotoUSA’s English colleagues share their first ride impressions of the reborn Hesketh marque – sampling the S&S V-Twin-powered ‘24’.
2014 BMW R1200GS vs KTM 1190 Adventure R
See the 2014 BMW R1200GS face off against the KTM 1190 Adventure R to see which is the better all-around adventure touring mount.
2015 Classic Air-Cooled Motorcycle Shootout
Old once again becomes new as Royal Enfield’s Continental GT, Yamaha’s SR400 and the TU250X by Suzuki compete for top honors in this Classic Air-Cooled Motorcycle Shootout.
2014 Brammo Empulse R vs Zero S and SR
MotoUSA's contributing editor compares the 2014 electric motorcycle offerings from Brammo and Zero in this EV bike shootout.
2015 Can-Am Spyder F3 First Ride
The 2015 Can-Am Spyder F3 is the latest three-wheeled machine in the Spyder line. MotoUSA headed to Canada to find out how it performs.
Ducati Monster Dealer Locator

Login or sign up to comment.

Comments
BamBam   October 13, 2012 11:45 AM
When you dyno a bike or car for that matter, the readings for hp and torque are REAR wheel numbers. You lose about 15% of power when it actually reaches the rear wheel or wheels. You add any where from 12% to 18% to those REAR wheel numbers and you get roughly your BHP (hp at the crank) numbers. 86.69 RWHP + 15% = 100BHP
MonsterElefant   January 12, 2012 06:10 PM
While I agree with most of Justin Dawes' opinions. His description of the power delivery seems typical of riders more accustom to in line fours and other bikes marketed by the big four. I have friends that could not adapt to the Ducati's power delivery. They had the same complaints. I have a 1995 M900 that matches nearly all the points Justin Makes. The gearing is very European having riden there five seasons, the averag speed there is much higher than in the States. I have 137,000 miles on my 95 now and the new EVO is the first new model since I purchased it that has me looking at my bank account closely. Great articel Justin. Thanks.
Piglet2010   September 27, 2011 12:01 AM
Is oil scavenging effective during extending wheelie riding?
Piglet2010   September 27, 2011 12:00 AM
Is the dynamometer really accurate to the nearest 0.01 lb-ft, and is this repeatable on the same bike, much less different bikes of the same model and year?
Spoxxter   August 30, 2011 12:11 PM
To the editor... Correct me if I am wrong, if the Monster is already lugging at 4,000 rpm when at highway speed, wouldn't you want to go up a few teeth on the rear sprocket? I believe going down a few teeth would make the gearing taller and thus lug even more. Most Ducati motorcycles smooth out after 4,000+ rpm.
TonyDee   August 30, 2011 09:56 AM
Superlight, Ducati has caught my interest with its sales up this year. Maybe dealer growth will come next.
screamer69   August 30, 2011 06:10 AM
looks cool....needs some Termi's to uncork that Mechanical Music...
Tessier   August 29, 2011 04:52 PM
Your still using flash? Hurry up and get on the HTML5 bandwagon so I can watch your videos on my iPad already. BTW how does the monster compare to the Griso?
Superlight   August 29, 2011 02:41 PM
Typical for an air-cooled, 2-valve Ducati, yes. The water-cooled, 4-valve bikes make considerably more power, though it takes more CCs on a twin to make the same power as a 4-cylinder motor and always will, as HP is directly related to RPMs and the twin cannot rev as high as a four (piston speed is the limiting factor).
Interestingly, although that air-cooled motor will never win a HP contest, it's a sweetheart on the streets, having all you need in almost every situation. We're talking what you need versus what you want here.
sands   August 29, 2011 02:35 PM
To the editor...Thanks for the review..just a consideration and you probably already know this...You mentioned the rear was a bit stiff and the front hunted a bit on the highway, it could be you didn't have enough sag on the rear...Thanks for the review!
TonyDee   August 29, 2011 10:20 AM
Is 86.69 horses and 65.93 lb-ft of torque typical for a Ducati at 1100cc's?