2005 CRF250X vs WR250F Suspension

Monday, April 18, 2005
Font Size: small text medium text large text
RSS Feeds
The Showa suspension on the CRF250X was just as plush as the Kayaba suspenders offered on the WR.
The Showa suspension on the CRF250X was just as plush as the Kayaba suspenders offered on the WR.
The WR's 48mm Kayaba inverted telescopic fork dances over gnarly terrain and soaks up big hits with ease. Likewise, Honda's 47mm Showa inverted cartridge fork performs beautifully. The stock settings were a bit soft for our flavor on both machines, but after tinkering with their adjustments we found ourselves in trail-riding nirvana.

Out back, Yamaha fitted the WR with a Kayaba single shock, while the CRF gets a Showa single-shock with 12.4 inches of travel. As much as I tried, I couldn't pry a complaint from our testers about the suspension. A good indication of how a bike functions is when the test riders fail to make any important notes and simply dismount with big grins smeared across their faces. Once again we reached a stalemate, neither bike seemed to land any significant blows in this middleweight fight.

With the mills offered on this duo, getting up to speed isn't a problem and neither is bringing them to a stop. Riding steep downhills and sinuous trails can be a disaster without a good set of binders. Front wheel washouts are common when a bike is fitted with sub-par brakes, but we're happy to report both the WR and CRF are equipped with a sweet set of brakes.

Honda is renowned for its braking refinement and the CRF250X adheres to tradition with a single 240mm disc in the front and rear, both actuated by twin-piston calipers. The WR offers up a single 250mm floating disc up front and a single 245mm disc out back, also actuated with twin-piston calipers.

The WR feels very narrow between the knees  just like Korf.
The WR feels very narrow between the knees, just like Korf.
Once again, when compared head-to-head, the two bikes exhibited differing characteristics. The WR binders feel more powerful, but the X offers up better lever feel giving the rider the option of feathering the brakes, which contrasts with Yamaha's new brakes that need to be coddled.

Tough as Nails

Unlike the machines from years ago, today's bikes come ready to ride out of the box with what used to be aftermarket components as standard equipment. Previously, a new bike required a set of aftermarket bars, a gripper seat, and maybe a few other components. However, Honda and Yamaha have both done an admirable job of offering high-end standard equipment, like the stock Renthal bars offered on both bikes. Those old puddy-like bars were good for about one, maybe two falls, and then it was off to the local dealer for a set of aftermarket handles that can take the punishment of real-world riding. That's no longer the case and in fact all of the hardware on these two off-road machines is quite impressive. 



Videos Our Sponsor
2005 Yamaha WR250F
Click to view video
Comments
Ryan Cañas - 2007 Yamaha versus 2007 Honda  March 24, 2009 10:36 AM
i going to buy a new bike soon and i cant decide between a CRF 250X and the WR 250F. Which one is a better bike?

Add a Comment
Your Name:

Subject:

Comments:

MotoUSA Magazine
Get your copy FREE!
Email Newsletter
Sign-up for our monthly update.
MotoUSA Mobile
Optimized for your mobile device.
Motorcycle Superstore
Shop with confidence - #1 rated.

Motorcycle USA covers the world of motorcycles with breaking motorcycle news, motorcycle reviews and motorcycle race coverage. When you can’t afford to miss a single event in the world of motorcycling, trust Motorcycle USA to bring you the inside scoop on the two-wheeled world.


Copyright 1996-2009 Motorcycle USA, LLC. All rights reserved.