Drag site icon to your taskbar to pin site. Learn More

2013 Kawasaki Ninja 300 vs Honda CBR500R

Tuesday, October 1, 2013
All three bikes are powered by a fuel-injected Parallel Twin, with dual overhead cams and four-valve heads. The biggest difference between the trio is obvious from their names, with the CBR500 engine slotting right in between the Ninja 300 and 650. Parse out the actual displacement and the Honda almost literally splits the difference, with its 471cc Twin 175 cc more than the Ninja 300 and 178 less than the 650.

The CBR500R engine lines up right between the two Ninjas, notable for its flat torque curve and linear power.

The Ninja 300’s 296cc Twin is the most oversquare of the bunch, sporting a 62mm bore and 49mm stroke. All of the extra displacement gained by the 300 came via a longer stroke, up front 41.2mm. But Kawasaki engineers retained the old 250’s high-revving 13,000 rpm redline thanks to a host of internal updates including new cylinders, pistons and connecting rods, as well as enhanced engine cooling to handle the extra heat generated by the increased power.

Honda’s Parallel Twin is a completely new design shared by the entire CB500 lineup. It is technically oversquare, but by the slimmest of margins with a 67mm bore and 66.8mm stroke – the bore/stroke ratio 1.003, compared to the 1.265 Ninja 650 and 1.383 Ninja 300 (down from 1.626 on the 250 predecessor). Tuned for street-friendly torque, the CBR mill redlines at 8500 rpm – a full 2500 less than the nearest bike, the Ninja 650R.

As for the bigger Ninja, its 649cc Twin debuted in 2006 – a long-running platform that’s powered the Ninja 650 as well as the Versys and short-lived ER-6n (short-lived, at least, in the US market). The 2012 model year saw the engine get a reshaped piston, revised timing and tweaks to the exhaust system. The 83mm bore and 60mm stroke have never been altered.

Up on the dyno, the three bikes register in the expected order. The bigger Ninja sports the punchiest torque curve, maxing out at 43.21 lb-ft at 7100 rpm. There’s more horsepower everywhere, even after the 650 falls flat well before the 11,000 redline peaking at 8800 revs with its 63.71 hp. The Honda CBR does its thing, cutting right between the Ninja power curves – topping out at 42.9 hp and 29.19 lb-ft. However, the CBR torque curve is remarkably flat, producing 25 lb-ft right off the bottom with its peak horsepower coming right at redline. Meanwhile, the spunky Ninja 300 manages 17.85 lb-ft torque at 9800 rpm, with the 35.41 horsepower max coming in at 11,200 rpm. Those higher revs for the 300 give the Ninjette a disproportionately higher power production per cc, with the 500 slightly closer to the smaller Ninja than the 650 in peak numbers.

The dyno charts are a fair evaluation of how the engines perform out on the street. The different natures of the 300 and 500 are immediately apparent. The Honda churns out a steady beat of torque everywhere, including right off idle. A perceptible boost kicks in between 6 to 8K, but the overall power delivery is mind-numbingly linear. There are no flat spots, where power drops off, zero.

The Ninja 300 presents a much different powerband than the steady CBR500. The little Ninja's high-strung Twin begs to get throttled up into five-digit territory on the tach where its starts to close the performance gap on its larger rival.
The little Ninja, on the other hand, sports a whole different demeanor. While low-end power has improved compared to its 250 predecessor, the 300 feels sluggish off the bottom compared with the larger-displacement Honda. What it can do, however, is scream its little head off as is revs up to the top end where it starts to make up ground. The Ninja 300 prefers to get wringed out to 9K (well past the CBR redline) and kept zinging in the five-digit rpm range. Even then it still can’t match the Honda, but it sure is a blast to flog up on the surging top-end.

Compared with the smaller bikes, the 650’s 63 ponies at the rear wheel are downright menacing. There’s more power everywhere, with a sweet spot between 6 to 9K. Intermediate riders will appreciate the 650 Twin as playful and snappy, but raw recruits may find the punchy engine a bit too much.

“The 650 seems like an obvious step into an intermediate level of riding skill and perhaps not geared for the legitimately new rider. There’s power there that needs to be managed,” notes our resident newbie, Byron.

The bigger Ninja’s livelier throttle makes it a more challenging ride than the forgiving 300/500 duo. The 650 Twin can hoist the front wheel with some aggressive smacks on the throttle – and newbies do need to tread lightly. This contrasts the Honda, whose throttle response is so composed its hypnotic. The 300’s fueling and throttle input is closer to the Honda than its bigger sibling, but it lacks the CBR’s refinement. The Honda’s smoother throttle and steady fueling is one of its entry-level highlights, without any disconcerting herky-jerky inputs it encourages rider confidence and an easy, flowing riding style.

The CBR50R engine features a smooth steady draw of power from its 471cc Parallel Twin, which makes for an easy ride.
The Honda is also easy to launch with its well-sorted six-speed gearbox. The seamless clutch engagement and gentle throttle make for a brilliant beginner bike transmission.

“Power delivery was always smooth,” confirms Byron. “I thought the transmission was the best of the bunch; there was hardly a discernible moment of power transfer when releasing the clutch, it just flowed. Also it was nice to have more engine power on tap compared to the 300 because you didn’t have to move so quickly through the gears during those stop-and-go moments.”

Riders do have to shift more often on the revvy little Ninja. This includes lots of downshifts – which are smoothed out by the surprising slipper clutch. It’s a marquee spec advantage for the Ninja over its Honda rival, and one which likely goes underappreciated by beginner riders who won’t notice how much its benefitting them. Our testers found the 300’s clutch engagement, toward the end of the lever, not as preferable as the Honda – but that’s a complement to the CBR, not a dig on the Ninja.

The Ninja 650’s transmission, however, is far less polished than the smaller rides. The gearbox is particularly rough around the edges, notchy enough even for our least experienced rider to call it out.

“Compared to the Honda, the Ninja 650 transmission felt a little clunky. It also required smooth inputs from the throttle and levers. I had a few oh-s%^& moments when I let the clutch out too fast or pulled the throttle too hard,” admits Byron.
Real world performance on the freeway finds the CBR500R stretching its legs out easier than the 300. The little Ninja has no trouble blitzing around the usual superslab impediments, like lurking semis or fast-lane hogging SUVs, but it’s not as effortless as the twist-and-go torque offered by the CBR. On back roads the two bikes offer paradoxical performance, with the Honda’s extra cc and flat torque curve delivering better acceleration but the 300 seeming sportier thanks to its top-end bias and frenetic gear-shifting pace.

At the pump, the smaller displacement mounts sipped a near identical amount of fuel – at 53 and 54 mpg. The nod here goes to the CBR, but it’s really a wash between the two. The larger CBR may burn more fuel with each engine cycle, but the 300 revs more frequently because of its higher rpm ceiling. (Having participated in the Ninja 300 mpg fuel challenge during the first ride press introduction, we personally can vouch for the high 80s and even witnessed triple digit mpg efficiency for more frugal throttle hands.)

The Kawasaki’s extra 0.4 gallons in its 4.5-gallon tank does bequeath a slim 18-mile advantage in estimated range, at 239 miles, but the CBR can still comfortably exceed 200 miles between fuel stops. The 650, unsurprisingly, registered a more down-to-earth 37.5 mpg during our testing – which factors into a 157-mile range.

2013 Ninja 300 vs CBR500R Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Slideshow
2013 Honda CBR500R Comparo Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Slideshow
2013 Ninja 650 vs CBR500R Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Slideshow
See how the Honda CBR500R lines up with its Ninja 300 & 650 competitors in the side-by-side spec sheets: 2013 Honda CBR500R, Kawasaki Ninja 300 and Ninja 650 specifications.
Recent Sportbike Comparison Reviews
2015 Entry-Level Sportbike Shootout
We gather the field of entry-level sportbikes for a show-down to see which machine is best in the segment.
2014 Heavyweight Supersport Road Shootout
After fighting for fast laps at the circuit, we pit the Ducati 899 Panigale, MV Agusta F3 800, and Suzuki GSX-R750 against one another, on the road.
2014 Light-Heavyweight Supersport Shootout
The wait is over: Ducati’s 899 Panigale lines up against the MV Agusta F3 800, Suzuki’s GSX-R750, and last year’s Middleweight Shootout winner, Kawasaki’s Ninja ZX-6R.

Login or sign up to comment.

weitzman   October 8, 2013 12:51 PM
Bart, Great report. All these bikes have their pluses and minuses, but you tell it like it is and newby riders should be able to handle a Ninja 300 or Honda 500 effortlessly. Both my kids started on bikes like these (one started on a Ninja 250 and the other had a neat Suzi 400 four cylinder Bandit. In the end my 250 son in about a year had a zzr 600 he put 20k miles on, a later zx-6r for 6k miles and now seven years after he started riding moved up to a duc 999 a year ago. My son with the suzi starter rides a tricked out duc 900 monster. He also had a cbr1000 repsol for a while as well. Even though they were riding before getting their license, they still attended the MSF school. both kids kept their first bikes for a while after upgrading as they were fun to ride, especially the suzi 400. I own three bikes, all sporty types of a liter or more. I liked riding both the 250 ninja and really had fun on the 400 bandit. I would have fun on any of the tested bikes, especially the ninja 300. Your test could not have been more explicit, except maybe for quarter mile times, but those are available in other stories on these bikes else where on your website i am sure.
WhatElseIsNew   October 4, 2013 11:38 PM
"On back roads the two bikes offer paradoxical performance, with the Honda’s extra cc and flat torque curve delivering better acceleration but the 300 seeming sportier thanks to its top-end bias and frenetic gear-shifting pace." I think this statement represents a flawed assumption, that noobs will think that a "screaming engine that only makes power at high revs" (an even then not much) is "sporty". The Ninja 300 is a classic "sporty-vehicle" fraud, no different than a Mustang II with racing-stripes. It may impress at first glance but will quickly become old at riding, unless one continues to see the silver lining and ignore the big dark-grey part inside it. A sporty machine is first of all, fast. You twist the throttle and it goes fast, even scary-fast. It is not "you twist the throttle and it slowly begins to start to think about going fast, and then 30 seconds later actually accelerates a little-bit". In terms of real-world performance the Ninja300 is about as far from a sportbike as a Smartcar is from a sportscar. Note that both are relatively small, light and nimble, with relatively-quick steering. But both are also relatively slow. Further condemnation is that you say that the Ninja 300 power-delivery is perfectly-safe for noobs. There is nothing about this bike that is "sporty" except the plastic.
WhatElseIsNew   October 4, 2013 11:23 PM
...considering the CBR500 has a 33% advantage in measured MPG over the 650 there's obviously more to that difference than mere displacement or even displacement and gearing. Is the 650 geared longer or shorter? They are all fuel-injected water-cooled twins but the CBR500 has a big advantage in fuel-economy/liter over the other two. Which, amazingly, have a big advantage in HP/L over the Honda. Which makes a great explanation as for why there are no performance metrics in this review. None of these bikes are really tuned for performance. Despite the 13k redline the 300 makes a paltry 35hp at its peak, which extrapolated out to even a ZX-6R (at 650cc) would be 80HP peak at 13k, which is just laughable. Especially considering that a 6R hardly weighs more than a 300Ninja. In any case the 500 is looking like both a great standard considering its engine-size and a great beginner-bike too. Who ever thought that you guys would show that without reverting to a discussion of top-speed, quarter-mile and 0-60mph times? LOL