Drag site icon to your taskbar to pin site. Learn More

Fed Task Force to Push Mandatory Helmet Law

Thursday, November 7, 2013
HJC FS-15 Carbon Fiber Red
A federal task force is preparing to recommend that all states in the US enact mandatory motorcycle helmet laws.
A federal task force made up of 15 members appointed by the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is preparing to recommend that all states enact mandatory motorcycle helmet laws, regardless of age or experience. Dubbed the Community Preventive Services Task Force, the group offers recommendations to the CDC and provides reports to the U.S. Congress on matters pertaining to community preventative services and policies to improve health.

The American Motorcyclist Association has long been an advocate for adult choice laws and suggests that it would be more advantageous to work to prevent motorcycle accidents in the first place than impose laws whose protective/preventative merit is questionable. According to the AMA's "
Position in Support of Voluntary Helmet Use," the "AMA believes that adults should have the right to voluntarily decide when to wear a helmet...The AMA asserts that helmet use alone is insufficient to ensure a motorcyclist's safety."

MotoUSA recently profiled a segment of the debate after
lawmakers in Michigan decided to remove mandatory helmet laws in favor of adult choice. Questions regarding the economic impact of helmet-less accidents vs. helmeted accidents, the economic impact of having lighter restrictions, other factors contributing to serious injury while on a motorcycle and a host of other issues were raised in the months following the law change in the Great Lakes state. Though both sides have statistics and studies to defend their respective positions, the issue is far from resolved as this most recent turn of events indicates. Currently 19 states have universal laws, 28 have laws for specific riders and three have no laws.

The AMA’s press release regarding the federal task force is included below. What are your thoughts?

A federal task force is poised to recommend that all states have mandatory helmet laws for all motorcyclists, which the task force says would reduce injuries and deaths as well as result in economic benefits, the American Motorcyclist Association reports.

The AMA has repeatedly expressed its belief that motorcyclists would be best served if regulators and legislators focus on programs to prevent motorcycle crashes from occurring in the first place. The AMA also said that any economic benefits would be insignificant since health care costs related to motorcycle crashes are miniscule in the context of total health care costs nationwide.

"The AMA continues to strongly encourage the use of personal protective equipment, including gloves, sturdy footwear and a properly fitted motorcycle helmet certified by its manufacturer to meet federal safety standards," said Wayne Allard, AMA vice president for government relations, on Nov. 7. "But we also believe that adults should have the right to voluntarily choose to wear a helmet."

The Community Preventive Services Task Force, whose 15 members are appointed by the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, makes recommendations to the CDC and reports to the U.S. Congress about community preventive services, programs and policies to improve health. The task force is preparing to recommend that all states have universal helmet laws, which means that all riders, regardless of age, would be required to wear helmets.

The task force is ready to make the recommendation based on its belief that a universal helmet mandate would reduce motorcyclist deaths and injuries, and that mandating riders to wear helmets would result in economic benefits. The task force believes health care costs for injured helmeted riders wouldn't be as high as those of injured unhelmeted riders, and also that universal helmet laws would result in fewer missed days of work for injured riders.

The CDC, which oversees the task force, is a federal agency under the Department of Health and Human Services and is headquartered in Atlanta. Its official mission is to protect America from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and in the United States. "Whether diseases start at home or abroad, are chronic or acute, curable or preventable, human error or deliberate attack, CDC fights disease and supports communities and citizens to do the same," the agency says on its website.

Explaining the AMA's opposition to the proposed recommendation, Allard cited the official AMA position on voluntary helmet use.

"The AMA strongly advocates helmet use, but helmet use alone is insufficient to ensure a motorcyclist's safety," said Allard. "There is a broad range of measures that can be implemented to improve the skill of motorcycle operators, as well as reduce the frequency of situations where other vehicle operators are the cause of crashes that involve motorcycles."

In its position on voluntary helmet use, the AMA noted that mandatory helmet laws do nothing to prevent crashes.

"The AMA supports actions that help riders avoid a crash from occurring, including voluntary rider education, improved licensing and testing, and expanded motorist awareness programs," said Allard. "This strategy is widely recognized and pursued in the motorcycling community."

Concerning the task force claim of economic benefits, the AMA noted that injured motorcyclists are less likely than the general population to use public funds to pay for injuries sustained in crashes, and are just as likely to be insured as other vehicle operators.

In addition, the AMA said the costs associated with the treatment of motorcyclist injuries account for a tiny fraction of total U.S. health care costs. An even smaller portion of these costs is attributable to unhelmeted motorcyclists, the majority of which are paid by privately purchased insurance. In 2000, for example, approximately 1.55 percent of total U.S. health care costs were attributable to all motor vehicle crashes. Motorcyclists involved in crashes represented a miniscule percentage of this figure.

To read the AMA position on voluntary helmet use, go to www.americanmotorcyclist.com/Rights/PositionStatements/VoluntaryHelmetUse.aspx.

About the American Motorcyclist Association
Founded in 1924, the AMA is a not-for-profit member-based association whose mission is to promote the motorcycle lifestyle and protect the future of motorcycling. As the world's largest motorcycling rights and event sanctioning organization, the AMA advocates for riders' interests at all levels of government and sanctions thousands of competition and recreational events every year. The AMA also provides money-saving discounts on products and services for its members. Through the AMA Motorcycle Hall of Fame in Pickerington, Ohio, the AMA honors the heroes and heritage of motorcycling. For more information, visit
www.americanmotorcyclist.com.
Dealer Locator
 
 
 

Login or sign up to comment.

Comments
counterintuitive   November 10, 2013 01:23 PM
"Why wouldn't someone want to wear a helmet?" In general I usually argue against protective equipment while riding becasue it leads to a false sense of security that leads to more accidents, so I understand the perspective. Except for helmets, gloves and decent shoes. You get hit in the face, head, hands and feet by enough crap while riding and it's a nonissue. Now, you get hit in the head not to mention the eyes while riding and THAT causes you to wreck, that's just your just rewards. What sort of idiot would ride at highway speeds without a good helmet and faceshield, as the wind alone would make it difficult merely to control the bike? And the idea of my skull bouncing or dragging along the road or smashing into a tree or rock is more than enough to get me to put on a fullface even when its 100 degrees. If it's too hot, I don't ride. I'm quite aware of what having my brain cooked is like. If it's that hot that you can't stand riding in a helmet? Then do not ride a motorcycle in the first place. There just comes a point where people are simply too stupid to be trusted with their own health, and not wearing a helmet with a good faceshield while riding a motorcycle on the street, I have no problem with that being the line of demarcation. These people need to be institutionalized. I can think of a few things in life that are so obvious as to be a no-brainer, and to not do it indicates no brains. Wearing a fullface while riding is one of them.
counterintuitive   November 10, 2013 01:13 PM
" I don't need a law that tells me I have to vote." understand that true stupidity will result in the loss of your "rights"
counterintuitive   November 10, 2013 01:12 PM
" it's about your right to make an informed decision for yourself." No it's not. Its about sheer common-sense. Even if one would say that you have the right to be stupid, that doesn't take precendence over the governments' authority to regulate stupidity. You don't want to ride with a helmet and suitable eye-protection, then don't ride on public roads. Motorcyclists have gotten away with this far more than too long already. The issue should have been over when that guy killed himself riding at a anti-helmet rally.
counterintuitive   November 10, 2013 01:08 PM
This is one of those cases where you are not dealing with a reasonable pair of opposing positions. Riding a motorcycle on the street without a helmet is insane. I'm not even sure that it makes sense to ride without offroad, even casually around the house. Let's put it this way, in the overwhelming majority of cases a helmet law makes total sense and to argue against one is idiocy. I'd be perfectly willing to let the police use their enforcement discretion to not charge someone when it made sense to not do so but the default position should not be that you should be able to ride legally without a helmet. That's just nonsense.
spokes   November 8, 2013 12:50 PM
to AnthonyD, it's not about whether you should wear a helmet or not, it's about your right to make an informed decision for yourself. I choose to wear a helmet because I want to, if someone chooses not to, why shouldn't they be able to take responsibility for themselves? To put it another way, I don't need a law that tells me I have to vote.
whasupmon   November 8, 2013 10:58 AM
To be fair "they" need to either mandate helmets for ALL motorcyclists or make seatbelt use elective for adults in cages. I will always wear a helmet when on two wheels and a seatbelt when on four wheels.
AnthonyD   November 8, 2013 07:52 AM
Why wouldn't someone want to wear a helmet? I fail to understand the cool factor in not wearing one. I wish I had more helmets!
spokes   November 8, 2013 06:38 AM
every few years we have the federal government looking to enact laws that affect our use of the highways. whether it's 55 mph, seatbelts, airbags, or helmet laws the purpose is the same. politicians want to get reelected, they need donors and they need to be seen doing something for their supporters, the people who will lose money if people are allowed to make their own risk assessments. if I chose not to wear a helmet and have a serious accident that my health care can't fully cover the insurance companies will incur a loss because medical coverage will still be provided. it's all about the money in a capitalist economy. do I wear a good helmet? of course. do I have health care? of course. does it matter? not to a politician who looks upon his election as a lifelong job, not as a service to you and me.
JSH   November 8, 2013 06:08 AM
This is why I am no longer a member of the AMA. That and their continued support of the "loud pipes save lives" crap.
Piglet2010   November 7, 2013 08:17 PM
What about Darwinian natural selection? Of course, what the US really needs is a universal ban on mobile device use (including hands-free) while driving, draconian penalties for at-fault cagers who harm others, and universal legalization of filtering (aka lane splitting).
thomboz   November 7, 2013 04:59 PM
I'm torn on this one, losing a few friends to MC crashes wearing those 'novelty thingies', and seeing their family suffer for years afterwards tends to give you a different perspective. I always wear a full face helmet... well almost, cruising by lake Couer De Alene in Idaho doing 35mph on a mild summer evening talking to my lady is a surreal experience. So I get it. But still, I don't want to loose my riding buddies.