Drag site icon to your taskbar to pin site. Learn More

NTSB Advocates Universal Helmet Laws

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

The National Transportation Safety Board has motorcycle safety in its sights after reports stating motorcycle fatalities are on the rise and is advocating that all states mandate a helmet law.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) announced yesterday that motorcycle safety is on its radar as one of the most important current issues and is lobbying for a universal helmet law for all riders. It is encouraging all states to enact legislation requiring riders to wear DOT-approved helmets. In the past nearly all states enforced helmet laws when they were necessary to receive full federal highway funding, but changed their stance in the 1990s when Congress repealed the requirement, allowing adult riders in numerous states to make the choice whether or not they wanted to wear a helmet. 

NTSB's Most Wanted List of Transportation Safety Improvements, announced yesterday at a press conference in Washington, D.C., added motorcycle safety to the list while dropping recreational boating, an area it reports substantial progress has been made. Currently, 20 states, the District of Columbia and four U.S. territories mandate that all riders wear a helmet. Twenty-seven states and one territory have partial laws, generally targeting minor and passengers. Three states – Iowa, Illinois and New Hampshire, have no helmet laws.

The NTSB is seeking to improve motorcycle safety based on reports stating that between 1997 and 2008, motorcycle fatalities more than “doubled during a period when overall highway fatalities declined.” Comparative figures between motorcycle and car fatalities were not given, though. The NTSB continued by stating that “Although the number of motorcycle fatalities fell in 2009, the 4400 deaths still outnumber those in aviation, rail, marine and pipeline combined.”
 
"State governments are in a unique position to effect the most significant improvement in certain areas of transportation safety," NTSB Chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman said in official PR. "Our Most Wanted List spotlights those states that have made noteworthy progress in better protecting the traveling public - and those that have not."

The NTSB validates their position by stating that “According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, head injury is the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes” and “therefore recommends that everyone aboard a motorcycle be required to wear a helmet that complies with DOT's Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 218.”

Of course, the report doesn’t include the fact that the number of motorcyclists on the road has also grown exponentially during that timeframe, increasing the odds that motorcycle riders will unfortunately be involved in fatal accidents. Though rider error is often at fault, it is not always the case. Look at the four motorcyclists who were killed in California this past weekend. They were members of a motorcycle club who were riding responsibly in a group when a car crossed into their lane and hit them head-on. The NTSB’s assertions might have more credibility if they would have broken down the motorcycle fatalities into specific categories, noting how many involved helmetless riders and how many were victims of collisions caused by other vehicles.
Dealer Locator

Login or sign up to comment.

Comments
Sloppy -Who's really dead  December 17, 2010 02:42 PM
Most of you didn't read the motorcycle crash report done by the goverment. Nine out of ten crashes were either alcohol and/or a first time rider under six months.

Even though Harley accounted for almost 90% of all crashes. This can be explained by the number of Harleys vs other bikes on the road.

But Harley's lead in motorcycle deaths must and can only be attributed to the lack of rider safey concerns(Helmets).
WILLIAM C. SMITH JR. -NEW JERSEY RESEDENT 65 YEARS OLD RETIRED AND HARLEY OWNER  November 26, 2010 01:40 PM
THE HELMET LAW WAS INACTED EARLY 60S WHEN I WAS 18 AND GOT MY 1ST HARLEY SO I HAVE ALWAYS HAD TO WEAR ONE...I GOT IN ONE SPILL AND IF I DIDNOT HAVE MY HELMET ON I MIGHT NOT BE TYPING THIS LETTER OR HAVE 14 GRAND CHILDREN...I KNOW HOW SOME OF YOU FEEL ABOUT CHOICE AND I COULDNT AGREE MORE.BUT YOU INCREASE THE ODDS IN YOU FAVOR BY WEARING ONE...I WILL ALWAYS WEAR ONE... THANKS...SMITTY.....P.S.CHOICE WOULD BE NICE TOO.
Dave Bellisario -older and saner.  November 22, 2010 05:45 PM
30 years ago when I was young and stupid I rode without a helmet as much as possible. Gradually, and the more often that I fell down, I started wearing one religiously. I go along with the freedom of choice angle with the additional caveat that if you are riding without a helmet you should not expect your insurance to kick in without a large premium. And you should not expect or allow this government to take care of your body or the people that you left behind.
Zippy -Bob, you got it backwards.  November 19, 2010 07:52 PM
The government does not own the roads. They exist becuase we let them, not the other way around.

It is about freedom of choice. They work for us, we hire and can fire them. Did you miss the last election?

Helmets laws have been gotten away with because bikers prefer freedom over watching TV. We organize, petition, rally, write letters and emails, make calls and raise money. All for freedom of choice.

The politcians see and hear this and act on it.

This may come as a surpise. They do not pass these laws to protect you, they do it to control you. You get what you settle for, you have decided to settle for giving up freedom for supposed safety.
Bob -I hate rules as much as the next guy  November 19, 2010 02:53 PM
but Ernie actually makes a good point in saying that the government already has laws in place regarding safety features and requirements. In cars and trucks, we have seatbelt laws and airbags are mandated with side curtain airbags becoming more commonplace as well. And since the government does own the roads and we merely are renters, it makes sense we should follow a certain set of their rules if we want to use the roads.

Why is being required to wear a helmet any worse than being told you have to wear a seatbelt? And what's so bad about wearing a helmet anyway? Afraid of helmet hair? Same with seatbelts? Afraid your pretty clothes will get wrinkled or is it simply too restrictive to whack off while driving?

One of my co workers got run off the road a little over a year ago. He has a sizeable dent in his bald skull to match the dent from the time he got run off the road 15 years prior. Then there's the large sheet off scar tissue from road rash covering that area. Looks pretty stupid and took quite some time to recover from. Not a look to be proud of. He's lucky though. He asked me to help him pick out a helmet when he was ready to get back on and is slowly investing in some other riding gear. Not too many 2nd chances at 50 years old. He's started to realize that wearing the gear is not uncomfortable and hot like he wrongly assumed.
ultra -not in ill  November 19, 2010 11:53 AM
Hey Gads,what rock did you crawl out from under. The government is NOT supposed to look out for my safety I AM. What is the matter with this country that everybody wants the government in their lives.If they get this, they will not stop.What will be next everybody has to have full leather to ride.Get out of my life and let me make my own decisions.And I do wear a helmet when I decide I want to.
Zippy -choice...  November 18, 2010 11:51 AM
Of course you have a choice, You can excerise your 1st amendment right to petition against it, you can run for office, organize rallies, vote for folks who believe what you do, get fined and appeal or move away.

I stopped wearing my seatbelt the day they passed the law. I will fight the fine if I get caught. I emailed the Governor and worked to have him defeated in the next election.

I do sometimes pull it down over my chest when I see a cop to look like I have it on. Don ot worry it is not unsafe. I can hold the belt, steer with my knee and shift with my elbow. As my Explorer is a 5 speed. Yes I DRIVE A POLITICALLY INCORRECT 4 WHEEL DRIVE SUV...OH THE HUMANITY!!!

I have served in the Military overseas, raced mountian bikes down mountians and surfed the north shore of Oahu.

I can make my own personal safety decisions.
Bill R -cagers pay attention  November 18, 2010 08:25 AM
Kirk66 is right,the number of motorcycles on the roads have increased in the past years with the cost of fuel and the economy,why not tell us exactly how many people in vehicle accidents die from head injuries?You can bet its alot more than motorcycle accidents.
And Steve,you dont hear of two motorcycles hitting one another,its usually a MORON in a car running over a motorcyclist,maybe they should outlaw cell phones in a vehicles and make people take an awareness coarse.Either way,some of us would rather die as opposed to being bed ridden with only a functioning brain,and mounting medical bills for our families to pay.Look, if you ride a motorcycle,you understand the risk,but its our risk and our choice.when you let the government take even one freedom away from the people,then it becomes easier and easier to do and eventually they will get around to taking one away that affects not just a few,but everyone.I dont need them telling me how to dress,where I can go,when I can go there,or how to get there,etc.If Im not endagering others,then stay out of what I do.
Whats next,helmets on planes,trains,buses,walking down the road,or maybe wearing helmets and breast plates in cars and trucks to stop chest injuries?
Gritboy -Helmet good. Vegetable bad.  November 18, 2010 08:18 AM
I wear my helmet and in CA, so I don't have a choice. I'm all for more people wearing helmets, but government doesn't need to mandate it, just educate the value of helmets. I wear a helmet; it's saved my head several times. Period. I think people are morons who don't...but it's their vegetable matter that that goes "squish" like a melon on the road, not mine. Been there, seen that!!! However, to each their own, as it should be. Personally, I think people who do wear helmets should get discounts on insurance (I live in CA so it's mandatory, so perhaps it is that way in some states), just like they do for taking and MSF course or wearing other gear (as they do in Europe)...but again, you should be able to choose not to wear one. Regardless, motorcycle safety is less about the helmet than the skill and LUCK of the rider. Money would probably be better spent creating better motorcycle licensing/training and teaching auto drivers to learn to see/respect motorcycles. Personally, I wish all car drivers had to learn to ride a scooter at the very least, so they had a sense of what it's like to be on two wheels; it's quite different when you don't have a metal box surrounding you as we all know.
Gads -Taking away our freedom?  November 18, 2010 08:07 AM
The government is supposed to look out for the safety of yourself as well as others. If you wanna argue the whole freedom thing, then you should argue the seat belt law. The fact of the matter is if you're kid or someone you care about goes to ride without a helmet wouldn't you be like, but a helmet on idiot. I'm not saying they should have a law or not, I am saying that you are an asshole if you do not wear a helmet when you ride.
John Sartain -IMHO for what it worth  November 18, 2010 07:03 AM
I personally wear a helmet but I don't need the government to tell me to. There are as many studies that can show statistics either way. The overall objective needs to be to reduce accidents, not fatalities. Rider Education and Driver Awareness programs over the past 2 years have done more to reduce accidents than any other measures ever employed before. The corelation being that less accidents equates to less fatalities. Programs advocating helmet use is what is needed. Consumer buy in works better than enforcement. Consumers need to be informed of truthful statistics and led away from the misconception that a helmet can prevent injury. Lets face it, in most situations all the helmet does is give the coroner a face to identify the victim of some cagers right-of-way violation. They could just as easily use DNA or the license plate on the bike.
Zippy -not anti helmet  November 18, 2010 06:32 AM
I am not anti helmet, I am pro freedom. You remember freedom dont-cha. We won it with all those silly guns.
W1LLPARKER -anti helmet opponents..  November 18, 2010 06:22 AM
are as deluded as the gun lobby folks...yep keep riding without a helmet dude and u too can have brain damage from a minor tip over..
Zippy -again...  November 18, 2010 04:46 AM
actually Steve they did address the helme laws...they chose freedom.

"I cant go outside acause someone from the gubmint said I might hurt and I'm ascared"

El Steve-o might want to trade that MC in one a minivan. You know just to be safe. Just sayin is all.
Zippy -Response to Steve  November 18, 2010 04:40 AM
Well Steve the governmetn you bow at the alter of is doing such a great job of securing the border and running the economy that they have time and resources to make our personal safety decisions.
Steve -Finally....  November 18, 2010 03:54 AM
It's about time someone addresses the helmet laws. Every time I read a story about a motorcycle rider who is a vegetable because of a head injury I think, oh great my insurance is going up next year. I am tired of paying for all these moron's mistakes!
Kirk66 -helmets  November 17, 2010 06:06 PM
Not to point out the painfully obvious to the NTSB, but from 1997 to 2007 motorcycle sales increased by double digits every year. Simply, we added millions of riders. Could some dealths have been prevented? Some, maybe. But the issues with rider accidents and fatalities is two fold. Lousy licensing standards and horrendous driver education of the fact that there are simply more bikes sharing the road.
I would expand but there's not enough space to take this on in this type of forum. You get the point, don't you?
As a motorcycle insurance professional for 11yrs and rider of 27yrs I could easily spend 2000 words or better on the subject.
Bill R. -If you dont ride,you shouldnt rule !  November 17, 2010 05:39 PM
If I am made to wear a helmet and have an accident and my head is saved but the rest of my body is mangled and broken beyond repair,is the NTSB willing to pay all my medical bills?
I dont know about everyone else,but if Im in an accident,I dont want to be kept alive with only my head surviving.I have been riding 42 years,mostly without a helmet,if I wanted something surrounding my head I would be in a car or truck.If they want to save motorcyclist,retrain auto drivers to watch for us before they make dumb moves while talking on their cell phones.Auto drivers die from more head injuries than motorcyclist,let them wear helmets.
ROBERT M. KNAUSS -22 YEAR A.B.A.T.E. S. IL. 27 ; 4 YEAR M.R.F. REGISTERED VOTER  November 17, 2010 05:30 PM
NO HELMET LAWS ; ILLINOIS HAS WORKED FOR YEARS FOR NO HELMET LAWS !!!
bikerrandy -MC universal helmet law  November 17, 2010 04:52 PM
While I don't need a helmet law to convince me it's safer to wear one, I also don't like some Govt. bureaucrat telling me I have to wear one. Part of being free is making both good and bad decisions. If you make a bad decision, eventually you pay for it. At the same time I figured out on my own it was wise to wear a MC helmet any time I'm riding. I live in a State that doesn't require it's use, but I wear a helmet 95% of the time anyway. And when I see a rider w/o a helmet I think, boy are you ignorant.
Ernie -Eroding freedom?  November 17, 2010 04:32 PM
You never had the freedom that you think you have. Consider that the government owns the roads, licenses your vehicle and licenses you to operate that vehicle. The government defines the condition your vehicle must be in while on the public roads and the rules you must follow while operating your vehicle on those roads - including the use of safety equipment. Breaking the rules of the road can result in fines (district court), jail time (county lockup), loss of vehicle (state impound) and loss of driving privileges (state revocation). As I see it, the only freedoms you have on public roads are your choice of route from point A to point B and what music you listen to while travelling that route. The entire system is already in government hands.
Mike Beck -Not in Texas heat  November 17, 2010 04:02 PM
Nope not wearing it in summer, just going to have to catch me leaving NTSB Arlington Field Office 624 Six Flags Drive Suite 150 Arlington, Texas 76011
Bruce MacMahon -Typical  November 17, 2010 03:25 PM
This is our federal government doing what it does best - overstepping its constitutionally-limited authority, by using our own money to coerce us into behaving in a manner deemed "acceptable" by some busybody bureaucrat in Washington. These people are like Terminators. They won't stop eroding our freedom until it's all gone.
robert mcallister -dt-175  November 17, 2010 12:40 PM
if they hadn't been riding so close together, that car wouldn't have gotten so many of them...

sc