2003 Kawasaki Vulcan 800 Comparison

MotorcycleUSA Staff | August 21, 2003
Six Grand Cruiser Shootout
The Kawasaski Vulcan’s biggest shortcomings are its tight ergos and dated styling, flaws that most of our test group couldn’t get past.

The Sportster rivals the Honda in terms of fit and finish and it also boasts the only set of self-canceling turn signals, which is a very nice feature for a bike possessing such a low price tag. The abundance of chrome and killer looks make it clear that even if Harley can’t win the performance wars they refuse to finish second to anyone when it comes to aesthetics.

The Kawasaki’s pluses and minuses are the exact opposite of the Sporty. While the Sporty is all show, the Vulcan is all go, a redeeming factor considering the $5,999 Vulcan is basically an aesthetic abortion. The Vulcan possesses all the style of the awkward cruiser-style bikes Japanese companies offered 20 years ago before they figured out how to properly rip off the Harley look.

The Vulcan’s raked-back handlebar in combination with the cramped riding position makes long rides uncomfortable, and even its lively 805cc V-Twin can’t save the Kawasaki’s ergonomics from being criticized. While the other metric manufacturers have updated their style, the Vulcan is archaic – it’s a deadly sin in the style-conscious cruiser segment.

The Vulcan’s liquid-cooled Twin was the clear winner on the dyno thanks to a cool 47.8 horsepower at a surprisingly high 7500 rpm, the highest of the group in both respects. Torque, at 39.3 ft.-lbs., is just barely the lowest in our test, but its peak comes at a relatively low 3500 rpm. The Twin feels good at any pace and excels at rapid cruising speeds.

2003 Kawasaki Vulcan 800 Highs & Lows
  • Most horsepower
  • Power throughout the RPM range
  • Right Price
  • Date styling
  • Uncomfortable ergos
  • Very soft seat hurts on long rides

If not for that beefy little engine, the Vulcan might’ve been left at home after just a few rides. The pillow-like seat becomes uncomfortable after an hour on the road and the close-coupled handlebars make an already smallish-feeling bike feel even more cramped for riders taller than 5’11”. In fairness to the Vulcan, our shortest tester, Ken Hutchison, who measures in at 5’8″, wasn’t bothered by its size.

“I don’t think it felt as small as everyone else,” commented Hutchison. “But the bars and styling could use an update. I felt like I was riding something from 1981.”


MotorcycleUSA Staff

Facebook comments