Drag site icon to your taskbar to pin site. Learn More

2010 Star V Star 250 Review

Friday, June 18, 2010
Videos Our Sponsor
2010 Star V Star 250 Video
Click to view video
Check out Star Motorcycles entry-level 250 cruiser in action in the 2010 Star V Star 250 video.
Unintimidating may not be the sexiest descriptor ever applied to a motorcycle, yet unintimidating is right up the alley for those just starting out on two wheels. An entry-level motorcycle needs to be easy-to-ride, functional and fun. The Yamaha’s V Star 250 pulls off all these feats quite well.

The 250 street bike market isn’t exactly robust these days in the bigger-is-better USofA. Riders not interested in a scooter or dual-sport have few options from the major OEMs. Kawasaki corners the sporty side with its class-dominating Ninja 250R, while Honda offers its Parallel Twin-powered Rebel (the Nighthawk no longer in the rotation). Suzuki delivers two options in its new single-cylinder TU250X (Read our 2009 Suzuki TU250X Review) and GZ250. The V Star 250 is notable as the lone V-Twin 250 from the major players. (Note: Hyosung’s GV250, which we were unable to secure for a comparison, also sports a V-Twin.)
2010 Star V Star 250 Review
It packs a little punch with its 249cc engine, but the V Star 250's V-Twin configuration helps it stand out in the 250 class.

Formerly known as the Virago 250 (cooler name by the way…), the little V Star’s 249cc engine resides down in the itty-bitty end of the displacement pool of the Yamaha Star Motorcycles lineup. While the 60-degree V-Twin won’t get mistaken for the big ol’ 1854cc mill powering its Star Raider sibling, it does deliver a more authentic cruiser look than most of its 250 rivals.

A single 26mm Mikuni carb feeds fuel to the air-cooled V Star engine, and liberal use of the choke lever, located on the left hand controls, is a must on cold starts. Thumb the electric starter and the 250 manages city streets quite well, once it shakes off its wake-up call. Two-valve heads top cylinders with a 49mm bore by 66mm stroke, the compression ratio an even 10:1. Dyno runs show a modest peak of 18 horsepower and 13.8 lb-ft of torque. So while the Star ain’t going to win many drag races (see sidebar), it does produce manageable, newbie-friendly power.
V Star 250
Lightweight at 327lbs fully-fueled the V Star 250 is quite easy to ride, with a low, inviting 27-inch seat height.
2010 Star V Star 250 Review

Acceleration is brisk enough to navigate helter-skelter city traffic, with smooth throttle and fueling ensuring the hamfisted newb won’t get frustrated with herky-jerky inputs. The Star’s little motor can rattle up to 55mph without trouble. After that, climbing up to 70-ish and beyond is possible, making it freeway capable in a pinch, but it takes a long time rung out to get around something like a 65mph-bound semi. Daily superslab work is just over its head, in our opinion, at least for carting around our 205 lbs. However, its near-70 mpg efficiency makes for a quick, reliable commuter on surface streets or tamer highway speeds.

A five-speed transmission gets the job done, though the clutch engages at the very end of the lever, an odd trait for a beginner mount. Neutral also proved sticky or hard to find, at times, with the left shifter pedal still pressing down in spite of being in first gear.

As far as brakes are concerned, the single 282mm disc/two-piston caliper front and rear drum aren’t overpowering, but they get the lightweight machinery stopped. It’s almost unfair to compare the V Star to its bigger, high-performance kin, but we would have liked more bite, as the front in particular required a hefty squeeze. That said, stomp the rear pedal, strangle the right-hand lever and things slow down quick.

2010 Star V Star 250 Review
It may not win many drag races, but the little V Star will still get you out on your favorite backroads - in our case up in the woods here in scenic Southern Oregon.
The V Star’s diminutive size and ergonomics tailor to the smaller statured, a big potential selling point. Dropping a heavy bike is a real dilemma for experienced and beginner riders alike, so tipping the scales at 327 lbs fully fueled a tipped over V Star represents a far less daunting challenge than the 700-plus lbs of many larger displacement cruisers. Another high point, the low 27-inch seat height makes reach to the ground simple for all but the most vertically challenge.

The flip side of the small ergonomic package is that taller riders feel cramped. The foot controls, in particular, impede larger feet, which can’t rest on them easily - the rear brake pedal being the most egregious offender in this regard. (One test rider kept wondering why the V Star was so slow, until he noticed his size 14 dogs were continuously dragging the rear pedal.)

The light weight and low seat height make those persnickety low-speed maneuvers a little simpler, the easy reach to the ground accommodating wayward beginner’s foot dabs. The size and weight make the V Star easy to move at any speed.

"With such high handlebars and a low weight, the V Star is easier to move around the garage than a full-size dirt bike," agrees MotoUSA's dirtiest employee, off-road editor JC Hilderbrand. "I never worried about pulling straight into a parking space like I do with big cruisers because I knew it would come right out."

On the open road the Star is remarkably easy to toss around the bends. The twin rear shocks are preload adjustable, allowing bigger riders to stiffen things up if needs be, but the bike feels fairly stable cornering. Before they know it, erstwhile beginners will find pegs scraping along in tune with their growing confidence.

"The suspension is pretty springy on the front end but it does well enough at the speeds it's capable of," says Hilderbrand. "Double shocks on the rear end are entirely unremarkable, but, again, how spectacular do they have to be for a cheap, entry-level ride? Overall I was comfortable on surface street debris like potholes, mancovers and railroad crossings."

2010 V Star 250
The V Star 250 lines up well with riders looking a easy-to-ride bike that's lightweight with an easy reach to the ground.
It’s difficult to look at the 250 next to a larger bike and not think it too tiny, but appearance is relative. Stick a 6’2” 300-lb man with a beer gut and beanie behind the controls and, yeah, the V Star 250 looks puny. Stick an easy-on-the eyes lady onboard, built more to scale with the Star’s dimensions, and it looks like a proper little cruiser. The solid-looking right-side exhaust and spoked wheels are all highpoints of the bike, but that V-Twin engine layout solidifies the cruiser pretentions and makes the Star looks bigger than it actually is (sort of like that kid in Junior High with the authentic five-o’clock shadow).

"The styling is pretty dang good, considering," concurs JC. "It's definitely not going to impress any ladies at the local hangout (not that it matters because it barely has the muscle to haul them home anyway). However, the V-Twin arrangement with black accents in the cooling fins look alright in my book. Same goes for the staggered pipes and spoked wheels. The biggest problem are the bulky, outdated signals and taillight. Slimming those down would go a long way. The mini ape-hangers aren't my favorite either but anything lower would be horrible ergonomically, so pick your poison."

At $3990 the V Star 250 represents an affordable, respectable-looking entry to the cruiser ranks.
We’d wager the value factor of used specimens fairly high to, as trading up to a bigger ride will likely come after just one or two riding seasons for many. Then again, casual riders may find the little Star scratches their motorcycling itch just fine.
Yamaha Dealer Locator

Small bikes invite a slagging because, well, they’re small and not terribly exciting. Yet test riding the Star drove home the point that you don’t need pornographic displacement and horsepower numbers to have a good time on the road. The V Star 250 still delivers grins under the helmet and does a fantastic job as an unintimidating, entry-level mount. While it’s not going to turn everyone’s crank, the V Star 250 does what it’s designed to do, and it does it quite well.
2010 V Star 250 Photo Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Slideshow
V Star 250 vs. VMAX
The cast aluminium  five-spoke wheels come in an the unusual 18-inch diameter size  with Bridgestone Radial tires.
Comparing the dyno numbers of the V Star 250 and its VMAX sibling show how much mind-blowing power the big Max produces. Rear-wheel dyno runs for the V Star 250 registered 18 hp and 13.8 lb-ft torque. The VMAX spun the drum up to 166.4 hp and 102.2 lb-ft torque. In other words, you could metaphorically cram more than two V Star 250 motors in each one of the Max’s four cylinders, the VMAX producing roughly nine times the power. No wonder its rear tire breaks loose just cracking the throttle open!

So, could the V Star 250 beat the VMAX in a drag race?

It absolutely could… as long as the drag race was more than 100 miles. See, the VMAX, as exhilarating as it is, has one gigantic, blaring weakness. It is to fuel what Joey Chestnut is to Nathan’s hot dogs. Those four-cylinders suck down the premium octane at a phenomenal rate (at least for a motorcycle). During our multiple test runs with the MAX, its 4-gallon tank consistently lit up the fuel warning light before 80 miles on the trip meter. We averaged a piddly 23mpg on the VMAX during our 2009 VMAX vs B-King Comparsion. Compare that to the 68.3mpg of the fuel-sipping V Star 250, which with its 2.5-gallon tank works out to a 170-mile range

So, that said, would we want to ride the VMAX for 80 miles or the V Star 250 for 170 miles?

What do you think…
Recent Cruiser Reviews
2015 Harley-Davidson Freewheeler First Ride
Harley-Davidson expands its trike offerings with the all-new 2015 Freewheeler and MotoUSA takes a ride.
2004 Sportster Project: RSD ProStep Bars
We remedy the old-look of our 2004 Sportster 1200 by installing RSD ProStep Handlbars, Nostalgia 4-Bolt Risers, Avenger Levers and Tracker Billet Grips.
Harley Sportster Chopped Rear Fender Install
The stock back end of our '04 Sportster 1200 project bike was big and bulky, so we cleaned it up by installing a Harley Chopped Rear Fender and Side-Mount License Plate Kit.

Login or sign up to comment.

Rich C -K1200LT Rider  September 29, 2010 10:26 AM
Bought a 2007 for my wife, I ride it from time to time, and it is a blast, am able to hit 70 mph going uphill with my 240lb plopped in the seat. I have even ridden 2 up with the wife, it works. I love the looks of the bike, only complaint is the brake and clutch levers stick so far out from the grips, my wife who is small, has a hard time grabbing them. I have loosened the adjustment so they arn't as hard for her to get pulled in, but just seems strange for a bike that is supposed to be for smaller folk....
TC -I love this bike  August 2, 2010 09:36 PM
When I got this bike and showed it to my friends they initially laughed at me because of how small it is. When I sit on it they shut up. I'm a short girl. It had a really hard time finding a bike I could fit. Most bikes I can't touch the ground at all let alone have my tip toes touch. This was the only bike I could find I could put both my feet flat on the ground. At first it was slow, it didn't like going too fast, but like any other new bike it just needed to be broken in. Now I go on the highways, cruise at 120km/h no problem. I took the back seat off, it looks so much better without it (why a 250 would have a passenger seat is beyond me. The bike wouldn't run well at all with two people unless they were both under 90lbs). I only have to fuel up every 250km+ and its only $7 to fill the tank at that point.
SoloLobo -newbie bike  June 22, 2010 11:50 AM
I took my daughter bike shopping to see if I could talk her into starting out on one of these. It definitely is a great package for a newbie rider, as well as any petite rider that needs nothing more than this in a bike. Well turns out my daughter had something else in mind when she told me she now wanted to see the 250 Ninja I had talked about before. After that I could not get her off the Ninja, or even mention the V Star without dirty looks from her. I still think the V Star would be the better starter bike, but you better check it with the kids first...
RJ -Twinkle twinkle little star 250...  June 22, 2010 11:45 AM
Way to make a 250 cruiser exciting again... :-) After all, the video has burnouts, sweeping turns, city streets, and many screams under the helmet... I swear I can hear the shrill cry of excitement on one of the turns...LOL! The bike is definitely entry level or for the mere enjoyment of economical transportation, I get that, but what I cannot understand in the year of 2010 is why not fuel injection? Properly mapped, the smoothness of acceleration is miles over carburetor versions and when targeting newer riders I would think this might be a logical consideration. I'm sure to keep costs down because an ECU plays a factor but it is 2010...
spectator -where is the efi?  June 21, 2010 08:41 AM
seriously, these things could pull 85+mpg if they had injection. Not to mention how much less of a pain cold mornings would be.
Mcguire -sewer rat  June 19, 2010 05:22 AM
These bikes have been around a while. I agree that it would be great for navagating city streets, but exspressways are a little beyond the reach of small bikes. Those big trucks move a small bike around too much. 500 cc is the smallest displacment I could use (90 miles a day on Interstate expressway) and feel comfortable. A little more power is a good thing in high speed traffic.
aarwar -bleh.  June 18, 2010 03:31 PM
not that it's not a decent enough bike, but given the changes in the last 20 years or so, I'd like to see something new. just out of curiosity, how was the ninja 250 doing (compared to the recent 250cc class domination) before the refresh? not so well, I'm guessing, as I see recent models on the street 10:1 compared to the last one. same with the ninja 650r (on a smaller scale) at some point a company has to bite the bullet and put a little work into a model to gain, regain, or hold on to a riders interest. even harley has reworked it's motors, styling, features, and frames many times since the virago 250 came out. and in "bigger is better" america, why not bump the displacement just a little to make it more highway capable? it's just a sleeved down 400 motor...