2009 Yamaha YZ250 2-Stroke Bike Test

Monday, December 08, 2008
Font Size: small text medium text large text
RSS Feeds



Because We Can...

2009 Yamaha YZ250
Professionally, the YZ250 (12) has to compete against the likes of Yamaha's YZ450F (7) and the rest of the 450 monsters. Now, with rule changes by the AMA, amateurs can race the 2-stroke in the 250F class which is much more realistic.

Our quartet’s throaty rumble and whir of cam chains was constantly interrupted by the zingy sound of an expansion chamber and shorty muffler. The AMA now allows 250 2-strokes to run in the 250F division, which has opened a whole new avenue for non-professionals. Since Yamaha is the only Japanese manufacturer still producing and importing its 2-stroke line, we brought out the YZ250 to run alongside our quarter-liter Thumpers, just to see if it belongs in the mix.

Weighing the same as our KX250F, the 231-pound machine has a distinct advantage in terms of sheer horsepower. The YZ put out 41 ponies on the Mickey Cohen Motorsports dyno while the most powerful F model spun up 34 (Honda) – only 83 percent! However, the way that power is distributed across the rev range is where the differences lie.

Basically, it is all a matter of personal choice. The 2-stroke is definitely a faster machine, but it takes more skill to get the most out of it, and some riders preferred the even spread of power from the 4-stroke, despite having less available. The one thing our testers did agree on was that the YZ can be very fun to ride, especially in the right circumstances. Here’s how they describe it.

2009 Yamaha YZ250
Our novice was one of the riders who favors the 4-stroke. The YZ was just too unpredictable for him and the confidence and precise control allowed by the 250F is ultimately a better fit.

JC Hilderbrand – Novice
Man, that YZ really surprised me. I haven’t ridden a 250 2-stroke in a long time, or at least one that is mechanically sound. I thought for sure that it would be a lot more fun because that’s what you always hear about them, but honestly it wasn’t as much fun as the 250F machines. The YZ basically just wears me out. It’s definitely way faster and as soon as you snap the throttle it wants to go, but you really have to be more careful about your gear selection. I kept missing corners because I’m not used to the lack of engine braking, so I had a hard time evaluating how well it turns. Since I spend so much time worrying about the track obstacles, especially jumps, a 4-stroke’s smooth delivery is ideal. There’s nothing worse for me than trying to size up a new jump and worrying about hitting the powerband right on the face of it. I love that it’s cheap and I’m sure if I forced myself to spend more time on it I would start to think otherwise, but I really have no desire to.
Sherri Cruse – WMA Pro

By far the best bike of the test ride. Although it wasn’t actually included in the test, it was fun getting the chance to ride the 2-stroke again. It sounds like they’re letting the 250's ride in the (amateur) 250F class, and personally I think it’s a great idea! If the women get a chance to ride them in WMA I will definitely get my hands on one. I know I would ride one at Southwick, but some of the other tracks I would go back to the 4-stroke. I would jump around a little bit.

"I just shake my head and look at my new EFI bike and want to kick it. "

Alvin Zalamea – Vet Expert

2009 Yamaha YZ250
The bike is definitely capable of winning against 250F equipment in the right hands, but really this machine is the most rewarding if you would rather bring home smiles than trophies.

I should’ve bought a brand new ‘09 Yamaha 250 2-stroke. Instead I bought a new CRF450R for $8300 out the door and put 1000 bucks in suspension from Enzo. That’s stupid! Street bikes sell for less. I’m seriously thinking of selling it and buying a YZ250. I’ve just gotten so lazy on the 4-strokes that I’m starting to forget how to ride. I just recently rode with Greg Albertyn at Milestone and he’s riding a 2004 RM250 and he’s spanking all those new-school, bubba-scrubbing pro kids on 250Fs and 450s. Literally, people pull off the track and ask who that Number 7 guy is on a 2-stroke. I just shake my head and look at my new EFI bike and want to kick it. I thought it was the bike and new technology and all that crap, but it’s not the bike, it’s the rider. This is all a conspiracy to keep spending more money to have the best stuff. Well it’s working… So if you’re on a budget, do yourself a favor and buy a brand new 250 2-stroke. Guaranteed you’ll have more fun and go just as fast, if not faster, than your buddy at the track for half the price! If I were competing in the amateur Lites class it would be a no-brainer to choose the 250 2-stroke.

Colton Haaker – Expert
The 2-stroke was a nice transition from the four-bangers. The power is a torquey even feel. I am very used to a KTM 250 and the Yamaha was easy to ride and immediately comfortable. I wouldn't call it a track bike, it is not comparable to the two-fitty Fs. I could take that bike off-road though and make it extremely competitive in EnduroCross. Some different gearing, maybe a flywheel and it’s good to go. The fact of the matter is 4-strokes are still better.

2009 Yamaha YZ250
Tod - "I own a YZ250
- and love it!"

Tod Sciacqua – Vet Pro
The ‘09 YZ250 is an all-around great package I raced the whole EnduroCross series and thought I was on the best bike out there for me. There has been little changed on the newer 2-strokes in the last few years. Most of the attention from the manufacturers has been on the 4-strokes. If I were to have the choice to race the 2-stroke 250 or the 4-stroke, I would pick the 2-stroke hands down. It has amazing, usable power and lightweight feel. With the price of 2-strokes and the maintenance cost, why not have a YZ250 in the garage.

For My Money.
Full scorecard.

Videos Our Sponsor
2009 Yamaha YZ250 - Motocross Comparison
Click to view video
2009 Yamaha YZ250 2-Stroke Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Gallery
View Slideshow
2009 Yamaha YZ250 Specs
2009 Yamaha YZ250
Engine Type: Single cylinder 2-stroke
Engine Displacement: 249cc
Bore & Stroke: 66.4 x 72mm
Compression Ratio: 10.9:1
Max HP: 41.3 HP @ 8400 rpm
Max Torque: 28 lb-ft. @ 7600 rpm
Cooling: Liquid cooled
Fuel System: Keihin PWK 38S
Ignition: CDI
Starting System: Kick
Transmission: Five-speed constant mesh
Final Drive: Chain
Wheelbase: 58.3 in.
Front Suspension: Kayaba w/ 11.8 in travel
Rear Suspension: Kayaba w/ 12.4 in travel
Front Brake: Disc
Rear Brake: Disc
Front Tire: 80/100-21
Rear Tire: 110/90-19
Fuel Capacity: 2.1 gal.
Curb Weight: 231 lbs.
MSRP: $6599
2009 Yamaha YZ250 Highs & Lows
Highs
  • More Power than 250F
  • Lightweight
  • Affordable
Lows
  • Outdated Looks
  • Requires More Effort to Go Fast
Comments
piston heads - lol  November 16, 2009 10:36 AM
hello im back for great new convorsation ive just brought a cer 500 af and wat bike
MT smoker.... - Thank Goodness for YAMAHA  November 9, 2009 03:27 PM
Can't wait to get my 2010 YZ250... Yes without the F, I have owned only 2-strokes and will never change my thinking. Some of you have became soft and dont want to work hard to go FAST... Well I am 38 now and I'd like to feel some sack between my legs and feel the rush, then to whine cause you got smoked by a 2-stroke...
DT - Ricky-cr500  October 5, 2009 07:58 PM
It is a simple answer to your question to why not make a 500 smoker.They can not put any 450 four stroke they will get close to it!They are still trying to figure out to race a 250 two stroke in the same class.
Hawkins - 2-Strokes  October 4, 2009 09:37 PM
im getting a KX250 2 stroke 2004. from all the talk i hear 2 strokes are going to be very good. its my actual bike but i've been riding my friends bike for 1 year which is a rmz250 really dont like how heavy it is. so im looking foward to the power to weight ratio in the 2 strokes, can wait to get it.(this weeked is the truth about 2 strokes for me)
DT - 4stroke What!!!  September 30, 2009 08:42 PM
This goes out to anyone who has raced!All the big names you see on tv or mags started on a two-stroke!If they didn't it truley is a shame.
aye - dt 125  September 26, 2009 09:34 AM
for me 2 stroke still one of the most fastest strokes ever i ride with my dt 125 and still a honda 250 can't bit!!!!!!!!
Trevor - Woohoo! 2 stroke!!  September 22, 2009 05:47 AM
03CR250R vs 04 CRF450R. Simple acceleration & top speed race (FROM STILL DRAG & FROM 3rd GEAR DRAG) 2 stroke wins. Every Time. (*personal experience*)

I wish Honda still made 2 strokes... :(


It ain't fast.....without mixed gas!
DT - 4stroke What!!!  September 7, 2009 08:20 PM
I have read sooo much about 450f's being a better bike.Well it's not true!If you take a yz250t any year after03 and compare you will see there is no right or wrong.I have a 04yz250smoker with a list of parts too long to go into and the end result is $$$.A 450f has to have 200ccmore to race against it!Oh as far as the cost about 450$$!!!
vince - nice  September 2, 2009 01:30 PM
i like that bike!!!!!!!!!!!
joe - gilera  September 1, 2009 05:10 AM
i have a gilera runner sp 50cc i then brought a malossi bore kit which was a 70cc/ i also brought a 21mm malossi carb/ i also brought racing reeds/ a bigger manifold was also added/ a racing crank shaft and bearings/ are in the engine aswell it has malossi variator rollers/ racing centrifugal clutch/ iridium sparkplug/ a bigger better racing exhaust system/ racing electronics/ cevlar racing malossi belt/ i use putoline racing sysnthetic 2t oil. by the way this bike is a 2 stroke and made in italy so the engine is strong and parts are prety cheap look at some gilera runners on youtube you will be preety suprised on how power pull mopeds and scooters can actually be when tuned etc. another model of the gilera range is the runner sp 125 saddly gilera dont make tis type no more because beying a 2stroke they are quite smokey so the euro laws came out so they were disscontinued but was swapped to a very slow 4stroke they also made a 180 cc model that was also a 2strok and fast. with the 125 model you can also buy a malossi bigger bore kit which will make the bike a 172 cc put it this way when fully tunned these bikes will do about 125mph i think for a scooter that is fast dont u think. about my bike i test rode my bike after easing the piston ring it the bore after doing so i test rid my bike on a straight remember its a now a 70cc i got a top speed of 110mph remember 50cc bikes only go a top speed of 30mph

ricky - cr 250  August 28, 2009 05:25 AM
hi i think 2 strokes are the best they are very powerful and i hate 4 stroke bikes they are sluggish compared to a 2 stroke lol.i grew up on 2 stroke bikes since i grew up on them i now have a cr 500 2001 model. i raced a 450 my cr 500 pissed all over it. it is a abeast and purely a supierior bike if you have got a 250 then look for cr 500 if you want more power seriously this is the bike. i cant understand why they have taken these beasts of the track. then swapped for a 450 machines theres no match to a 500 in mx
JC - 2010 Yamie 2T  August 24, 2009 10:44 AM
I think Yamaha already had its press launch for the 2-strokes (not 100% sure). They should be out asap.
kiko - Re: JC's feedback  August 22, 2009 04:53 AM
Thanks man for the response!

Sure i just hope they do allow to race them. Any scoop as to when the 2010 YZ250 2T model may (or may not) come out? Or we have to wait and see after the All-Japan MX Nationals Championship this September '09?

Ciao!
sout sider - hp/power  August 18, 2009 11:58 PM
thats not right! my dads '04 yz 250 puts out 50.1 hp while my uncles '06 crf 450r puts out 46.7 hp! (mabye your 2 stoke wasnt tuned...)
south sider - power  August 18, 2009 11:52 PM
thats not right!!! my dads '04 yz 250 puts out 50.1 hp on the dyno while my uncles '06 crf450 put out 46.7 hp! you guys got it all wrong! (or mabye the 2t need tuning...)
JC - RE: kiko  August 17, 2009 08:31 AM
I think the stock YZ250 is way more powerful than the 250F bikes. It feels like a lightweight rocketship, but they're just two different breeds. We'll see if they let the 2T race with the 4T in professional racing. If so, my guess is that they'll be more than competitive and a favorite choice of the racers.
kiko - hp and torque on the YZ250  August 15, 2009 01:43 PM
Hi JC, the bone-stock YZ250 makes 46.8 hp at 8800 rpm (doesn't lose 5 ponies until 9600 rpm; in fact, it is still making 45 hp at 9100 rpm) and put outs 30.6 ft-lbs of torque, quoting MXA magazine.
kiko - for JC Hilderbrand  August 15, 2009 01:38 PM
Hi JC, what were thoughts about the YZ 2-stroke bone-stock? A lot of power than the usual anemic 250F you reckon?
RP121 - Amateur speakin up  August 14, 2009 10:09 AM
I had a 2005 crf250r for 4 and a half years, great bike BUT it cost me an arm and a leg...six months ago bought an 09 YZ250, Love it. My laptimes have eclipsed to much faster than on the F. Bigger jumps are attainable now. I am looking forward to the maintenance as it will be a $150 affair. I raced it recently, holeshot, win. Much better performance than on my crf250. I had an advantage over the four strokes. Oh if you cannot figure out premixing, get a Ratio Rite dude. It is a better bike for the average Joe, such as a working college student such as myself. I just dont understand why everyone gets so bent out of shape when people say that a 2 stroke is better bang for buck. get off the couch, go ride the dang bike. Unless you gotta mechanic or buy a new F every year, I suggest you check out Yamaha's YZ250. Great suspension, very good predictable handling, smooth strong engine (I holeshot 450s-not a lie), cheap to maintain, and IF something catastrophic happens you wont be out $1500. dont say I didnt warn ya.
jp - what r u thinking  July 8, 2009 06:22 AM
2strokes r the best they keep u ready to ride hard,fast and at your best
JG1 - 2Smoke  June 8, 2009 03:01 PM
Been riding 2Strokes right under 20 years now, started on a brand new 1990 red/white YZ80...only 4 strokes i remember seeing were the XR's, but most of my uncles during this time were riding the 500 2strokes. Back then, this was the 2stroke generation, these were the bikes to ride, this is all we knew growing up. I have ridden both the 250F/450F, and while these are great bikes they are not enough to make me switch. The 250F is too docile, and the 450F has different characteristics I just don't like (weight, engine braking, starting issues, Maintenance $, etc.) based on my riding style in single track conditions. The 450 is smooth, and far from intimidating like most say...having grown up on the 2stroke powerband, I feel I can abuse a thumper even more...it's predictable linear power is just that...predictable! I can blow up a 250F, and ride a 450 thumper like my 2stroke, but it comes without the grin. It sucks Manufactures have eliminated the smoker, because it is trully sad to see this generation "learn" how to ride on a thumper. It's like taking away dirt bike history. I will tell you this from experience, a 2stroker can ride your thumper like his 2stroke, but isn't funny that a true thumper CAN'T ride a 2stroke like his/her thumper???
taekwondojunkie - bens comment  June 3, 2009 09:14 AM
2 strokes are not all that much cheaper than 4 strokes.plus the 2 strokes MAKE you earn their respect.
ausmx - whadayatalkinabout  June 2, 2009 11:31 PM
Um... Do you really think if 250 2T's were faster than 450F that all but the YZ and Kato remain? I have ridden and raced all these bikes. I raced 125's and 250's long before there were 250fs and 400, 426 and 450Fs and I will give the 2T one tick... In loam/sand I kill my lap times on a 250 2T compared to a 450F but i think it comes down to the weight difference and not getting as stuffed on the 2T... Im an A grade rider so if you were comparing a B or C grade rider maybe they'd be faster on a 450 in such conditions... BUT... the reality is that 80% of people that buy these bike are not A graders AND even more than that... A 450F/250F is a better overall bike for the extremely varied conditions that are found on MX tracks around the world... I love 2T's and if all the tracks I rode on were sand/loam i'd still have a YZ250. For now Ill keep my CRF450 but as I say, once you've loved a 2T that love will never leave. I got a KTM 300 EXC in the garage as well for those X country days and general ball tearing fun!!
Ben - WTH?!?!  May 31, 2009 02:25 PM
2 strokes SUCK!!! What are you fools smokin? premix? 2 strokes suck front to back, top end to bottom end! They are cheaper, and thats the ONLY benefit.
jeff - 2002 suzuki rm125  May 22, 2009 07:03 PM
just picked up a 2002 suzuki rm125 and i love it so much i used to ride my dads 2006 honda crf250x and this thing puts it to shame i really hope they will bring two strokes back, plus you can mod a two stroke way more then you can mod out a 4 stroke. ( 4 joke , 2 smoke) thats what i say!!!!
taekwondojunkie - 2strokes  May 21, 2009 01:14 PM
im 39 years old.the last time i jumped on a dirt bike was 1984.i have a friend that rides flat track bikes.hanging around him put a fire under my a!@#.and all of a sudden im riding dirt bikes.so i go out a find me a "99" yz250 2 stroke.got it for $1700 and its a beast.after riding it all the time i test rode a 450 four stroke,i still got a little to learn about dirt bikes but i do know this...four strokes are a cool ride,but the next bike i buy will certainly be a 2stroke.i simply love the off the start power they have.and from what i understand they are a WHOLE lot cheaper to fix.so im giving MAD PROPS to the two stroke.in my opinion the only thing that gives the 4 stroke the edge,is that you dont have to worry about premix.
brad - 2 strokes rock  May 19, 2009 08:09 AM
4 strokes are the best hell they only need 2 times the motor and are 2 times the weight why dont they put the money into a 2 stroke 450 and neglect a 250f lets see what the 4 stokes got on that now there not so good without a handicapare they. The way i see this as is the dirtbike companys taking candy from kids at the candy store my 4 stroke buddy blew up his bike he siezed it and with how much it was going to cost to rebuild it, it was cheaper to buy a new bike. I just rebuilt a 2 stroke with worse problems and yes the bike was a 2001 without any rebuilds ever and my four stroke buddys was a 2005 and he barely put 100 hours on his bike but anyways it cost me a sweet 700 bucks with tools prices included.
shrubitup - you need an F on the end of a 250??  May 5, 2009 10:51 PM
This is similar to Hildebrand's review of the 2009 KTM 250XCW. He doesn't know what to make of it. It's just not his thing. THAT'S FINE but don't go throwing your preference into this. What about the rest of the bike besides the motor? Good or bad? Who knows because you so simply dis the bike because it's not an F bike.
mx4lyfe - 2STROKES!!!!!!!!!  May 4, 2009 11:28 AM
i had the crf250r. yeah it was ok and i had to keep puting more and more money into it. so i bought a 2001 cr 250 damn. that thing runs better. more power and every thing u will ever need. BRING THE 2STROKES BACK!!!!!
Bill - 2-strokes vs 4 strokes  April 20, 2009 07:42 PM
To me you steer a 4 stroke, but you drive a 2-stroke. So, if you want comfort and ease of operation ride a 4-stroke but if you want raw power drive a 2-stroke. It's like an automatic verses a standard sports car, both are fast but built for different owners.
sally - Ok well  April 20, 2009 02:35 AM
I'm the only one here that likes four strokes too? Wtf lol. I do agree that for pure shits and giggles off road riding, or if you are racing two strokes are going to be faster, up to about 500 cc. After that the abrupt power delivery will just pull the front wheel up and you won't actually go anywhere haha. But anyway for enduro trail riding, rock crawling, ruts, hill climbs and all that stupid shit (a very different kind of riding), four strokes will eat the smokers any time. Anyway I've ridden at least 15 different bikes, and I have to say the one that put the biggest stupid grin on my face was a little Kawasaki KX85! You gotta love a bike that weighs like 100 pounds and can power wheelie in fourth gear. I giggled like a god damn school girl the entire time I rode that damned thing haha. Jumped right on, got it into the power band in first gear, pulled a huge wheelie, let it back down, did the same thing in second, third and fourth, several times. Hahahah I could do that all day long. That's the only reason I would ever really want a two stroke though. I would just takie it out and pull wheelies all the time.
Riley - 2 stroke come back  April 13, 2009 09:55 PM
support companys that continue that to reasearch 2 stroke motors!!!! they are the best why every one fails to realize this is beyond me??? they can burn cleaner with out a cat so imagine what they could do if they actually spent time to research them Evinrude is one of the few companys researching how to keep the 2 stroke alive!!!
pinned927 - eeeeeyyyyyooooot  April 12, 2009 08:40 PM
I sacked up a while back. I had 3 450's in my garage and said ya know what? eff it. i wanna run caster oil and triple clutch every corner again. I sold my least expensive (least liked) 450 and bought a 250 2 stroke 3 weeks later. After that, i seriously didn't ever have a desire to ride a 450 again. Now i'm gonna sell another 450 and get a 250f. they're all fun
tyler - motocross  April 10, 2009 07:11 AM
I suck at motocross i just like to ride lololol
bryan - just bought an 09 yz  April 8, 2009 08:43 PM
i have been riding 450's for a while now, before that i rode 250f's and have always been a smoker fan, recently sold my 01 cr 250 and my 450 to buy the new yz, i race competitive motocross and some tighter arena cross style tracks. hands down being a blue collar everyday guy who rides, the 2 strokes make since, cheaper, faster, and the fun factor is off the charts. its like a rocket ship waiting to take off. and who can beat the sound, smell and feel of a smoker when its pinned. i made a decision over night. im bringing it back to the smoker in hopes my friends might follow along. everyone, write your letters, go buy a smoker and lets get these things back where they belong, on the podium.
jake - wtf?  April 1, 2009 07:25 PM
i have a four stroke 250f that i bought brand new last year... and honestly i put so much money into that bike just to keep it running..and it seems like im not getting any power out of it.. im trying to sell it for a 250 two stroker..im sick of that pile of junk..
johnny man - 2-strokes  March 20, 2009 08:11 PM
I have a yz 2-stroke and I love my bike!!. The kx 250f I had sucked!!!. The 4-strokes have a weight that I will never like,and had I known it had cams,chain,valves,ect,ect,I would have never bought one!. What a waste of money when I could have bought a RM 125 2-stroke. This industry 4-stroke scam is like AIG and their corruption. Motocross was never designed to be a sport for the well off. It is a sport that the average 9 to 5 person could work all week, then go racing on the weekend. Not worry if he can afford to. YAMAHA,KTM, keep making the 2-stroke!. I also noticed more pros are going over the handle bars of these 4-strokes. I sure don't want one landing on me.
JD - bring them back!!..  March 18, 2009 07:57 PM
2 strokes are better bikes!, they give you better skills, less weight, easiest maintenance! and lotss of more advantages!! please bring them back!.. began buyin your 2 stroke and u will not regret it!..
randy - two strokes  March 18, 2009 06:53 PM
fast, cheaper not cheap, takes more practice to master all part of the fun, much easier to maintain, quiter, instant throttle response if you have the nerve, the person who has the most fun wins.
rpm - YZ250 vs YZ450F vs YZ250F  March 15, 2009 06:56 AM
Unbelievable that the article states that YZ250 against 250F is more realistic. A 2 stroke bike is much harder to ride, but as the Japanese Yamaha factory representative said: "4 stroke is just a fashion statement, you can only go really fast with a 2 stroke" Obviously, it all depends on a rider, but definitely a 250 is not even in the same universe with the 250F. Rode on both, 250F is a joke compared to a higher category 250 2T. 450F is a great bike, but with a great rider easily can be beaten with a 2T. Maybe because of the higher torque feel on a 4T that everybody thinks that 2 strokes are weaker, but people need to understand that it just requires a different riding technique and then it is definitely faster than anything in the world. :)
Andre - 250F ? pphhhh  March 5, 2009 06:03 AM
These 250F's are pathetic. They need an expensive engine rebuild after 60 hours and you have to rev the piss out of them if you want to go fast.Not to mention they have no bottom end power whatsoever. BRING BACK THE SMOKERS
mototony - 2 vs. 4  February 23, 2009 11:49 AM
My KTM 300 2-STROKE makes plenty of torque in a broad RPM range. My motor never chewed itself to bits like my friends 4 stokes' have. My bike is MUCH quieter than the 4 strokes I hear at the track and on the trail. Once rolling my bike feels lighter as well. So lets's see -less initial cost, less maintenance, less moving parts, less noise, less weight, and more fun when the throttle is twisted. Tough decision. As for EFI, you can't beat "automatic jetting", but EFI can be, and already has been adapted to 2 strokes. There are still companies out there working on 2 stroke technology and I am surprised we do not see them in cars by now. If the govenment "experts" ever ban 2 stroke dirt bikes, I will take out a loan and by as many as I can afford before they are outlawed.
2Smoke - Let's be honest  February 22, 2009 07:17 PM
4 strokes are gutless compared to 2 strokes.
Rick Littleton - I am very much interested in your new line of 250cc, two( 2)- stroke motorcycle.  February 19, 2009 08:20 AM
Is totally legal for street use with a head lamp,turn signals ect. Please contact me as soon as you can also what is yamha's MSRP. Thank you very much for your time in this matter.Email Address,nelsonx6@att.net
Nick West - American 2 Strokes  February 19, 2009 08:16 AM
Hey nice to see your American AMA has done at least something to re-dress the balance for 2-strokes in the amateur classes. In Europe they are looking likely to bring the displacement in the pro series of FIM Motocross so its 250cc 2 strokes against 350cc 4 strokes (dropped down from 450's) - in order to redress the unfair power the 450's now have due to all the R&D done on 4 strokes in the past few years. see this link http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/sport/sportresults/mcn/2007/december/dec17-23/dec2307ktmback350ccmx1plan/ Im in England (UK) and I have a 2 stroke KX 250 actually Road Registered! I don't need to worry about which bike is 1 or 2 seconds faster on a track - I ride for pleasure and fun on the open roads here. I think we are the only country in the world where you can road register these bikes without any modifications (we just have to put a number plate and a horn on it!) - fully insured and taxed - I'll be on it this weekend and I LOVE my 2 stroke!
mikey - 2-strokes  February 13, 2009 11:08 AM
four strokes are for girls!
Bike Dude - 250 - Colton what the hell !!  January 30, 2009 10:00 PM
Your coments about 4 strokes still being "better" is ridiculous. The smokers rule supreme in the offroad segment, especially if you see how many of them get podium titles in races like Erzberg,ISDE and Romaniacs. Plus a 250 smoker would eat a 250F alive any day, who cares if the 250F makes broader power, the 2 stroke is making 10 more horsepower for Gods sake !!! Thats 30 percent more than a 250F and its cheaper to run to.I hope you guys have fun doing your 700$ rebuilds when your valves go south.
Dan - 2-strokes rule!!!  January 12, 2009 06:53 PM
#1 Mixing your gas is not hard #2 Goin fast on a dirt is not the bike, its the rider #3 2-strokes are much cheaper to maintain #4 It depends on your personal preference I love 2-strokes especially 125's and I'm 46 yrs old, 175 lbs. It just comes down to what you like more. If you can afford the rebuilds on a 4-stroke then go for it. But for me it makes more sense to ride a 2-stroke. I do like riding 4-strokes, but I dont want to pay for one. The 2-stroke motor, IMO, is the cheapest, most powerful, easiest to work on, and the most efficient motor there is, hands down.
Willy P - Something to say  December 29, 2008 08:36 AM
I am glad that the YZ 250 was brought into the test with the other 250F's. If they are able to race with them in the amateur class then maybe they will change the pros. A 2 stroke is sooo much easier to maintain and then cheaper to operate on top of that. This bike could help keep some people in this sport like myself who can't afford the upkeep on a modern 4 stroke but love to ride and race with the ability to stay competitive. Long live the two stroke!
bob - 2009 yz250  December 26, 2008 02:35 PM
well to me its about being more focused and having more fun and being fitter to ride a 250 2 stroke. all these test riders only rode the bike for like 1 day and if they had like a couple of months or even a year to ride the bike they would all change their mind and say its pretty competitive, all you need to ride one fast is to know the bike, if u know the bike you can push it and know what it will throw at you. and how can mixing premix be a pain in the ass, at least you will know its got some fresh premix that will make the bike run like a million dollars and have some blue smoke that will choke the competition :)
blaze - 2009 2-stroke yz250  December 19, 2008 08:18 PM
THIS IS A HUGE THING! IM MIGHT GET ONE MY SELF!!!
John - I have something to say...  December 19, 2008 06:09 PM
How could you say, 'make sure it's got an 'F' at the end of 250 if you're racing a lites bike?' It's that attitude, sir, which is the reason why 2 strokes are dying out. Well maybe not, but still... 2 strokes are a lot more fun than 4 strokes. I own a kdx220 and if I was going to get a new bike it'd probably be a yz 250 or sx 250. It's a good size between 250f's and 450f's and it's less maintenance, I hear. Cheaper too. In your closing you should've said, "if you're a wimp who can't handle the 2 stroke and would rather be lazy on a thumper than go for a 250f." I'm just poking fun; but I understand what you're saying about being in the right gear. With a 2 stroke you need to be revved out when you're hitting corners to get the most out of the bike, so it's more difficult in the sense that you don't have that long pulling traction that a 4 stroke has. Mixing the right amount of premix oil each time can be a pain in the ass, too.
JC - Nothing to Say?  December 17, 2008 04:20 PM
Come on, folks! No comment on the 2-stroke. Hell, it was all our testers wanted to talk about. This is a big deal for amateurs... Isn't it?

Add a Comment
Your Name:

Subject:

Comments:

MotoUSA Magazine
Get your copy FREE!
Email Newsletter
Sign-up for our monthly update.
MotoUSA Mobile
Optimized for your mobile device.
Motorcycle Superstore
Shop with confidence - #1 rated.

Motorcycle USA covers the world of motorcycles with breaking motorcycle news, motorcycle reviews and motorcycle race coverage. When you can’t afford to miss a single event in the world of motorcycling, trust Motorcycle USA to bring you the inside scoop on the two-wheeled world.


Copyright 1996-2009 Motorcycle USA, LLC. All rights reserved.