Drag site icon to your taskbar to pin site. Learn More

Bryan's Blog

Oregon Law - Riders Must Take Safety Course

Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Our group of newbies switched machines often to get an idea of the bikes differences.
Oregon became the third state in the country that requires new riders to take a mandatory rider training course before getting a motorcycle endorsement.
Seems like my home state passed a couple new motorcycle laws for 2010. Senate Bill 546 requires that all new riders complete an ODOT-approved motorcycle safety course before they can get a motorcycle endorsement. Oregon already required riders under the age of 21 to complete the course, and starting January 1, 2011, this law expands to all new riders under the age of 31. By January 1, 2015, all new riders or motorcyclists who have let a year go by since they renewed their endorsement will be required to go through the class. The only approved rider education training is through the ‘TEAM OREGON’ Basic Rider Training (BRT) course. Oregon becomes only the third state in the country to adopt mandatory rider training, joining Florida and Rhode Island on the short list.

The ‘Team Oregon’ Basic Rider Training is fairly basic, teaching turning, braking, obstacle avoidance, traffic strategies, and basic bike maintenance. Maneuvers are performed in a controlled environment at parking lot speeds. A BRT course waives both the DMV motorcycle knowledge test and the on-cycle skills test. The Basic Rider Training course is $179. This on top of the $87 fee for the motorcycle endorsement, a fee that bumped up $10 starting Jan. 1, 2010. Throw in the required insurance fees that are bound to be higher for new riders and paying for the privilege to ride a motorcycle quickly adds up.

I’m all for requiring newbies to take a class if they really want to ride a motorcycle. But I believe making them pay $179 in addition to the $87 endorsement fee is too much. Riders who pass the class are exempt from the DMV motorcycle skills test, so why not cut them a break on their endorsement fee to boot? Makes me question whether the legislative powers actually have rider’s best interests in mind or is it just another money-making scheme? Is it a knee-jerk reaction to a bunch of slanted statistics or will the program really save lives? In their motorcycle facts and figures report, they talk about the increase in motorcycle-related fatalities, but they don’t mention that the increase in the number of bikers on the road logically means this number is going to go up as well.
 
House Bill 2370 gives motorcyclists who took the course a little break on their insurance, but the amount of discount they will receive is left to the discretion of the insurance companies.

You also don’t want to get caught without a motorcycle license now in Oregon. Effective Jan. 1, 2010, Senate Bill 124 increased the penalty for riding a motorcycle without a motorcycle endorsement from a Class B ($360) to a Class A ($720) violation. The fine can be suspended though if a rider completes training and receives a motorcycle endorsement within 120 days of sentencing.
 
A few Oregon Motorcyclists Facts and Figures:

* There are 131,204 registered motorcycles in Oregon, or about 3.2% of registered vehicles. 
* 235,754 Oregonians have motorcycle endorsements on their driver licenses, or about 7.9% of licensed drivers.
* TEAM OREGON trained 9,972 people in 2008.
* In 2008, there were 873 crashes involving motorcycles; 834 people were injured and 49 people killed. 48 of those killed were motorcyclists.
* The number of motorcycles involved in crashes increased from 746 in 2007 to 873 in 2008.
* Across the nation, motorcycle crashes involving injuries and fatalities are rising. Oregon is no exception. Motorcycle crashes in Oregon have almost doubled from 2002 (443) to 2008 (873). In contrast, during the same time period, the total number of crashes for all vehicles decreased 13 percent.
* Fatal motorcycle crashes represent 11 percent of fatal crashes in 2008 while only representing 3.2 percent of total registered vehicles.
* Speed is a factor in the majority of motorcycle crashes. Motorcyclists and/or drivers are either going too fast for conditions or exceeding posted speed.
* The majority of Oregon fatal motorcycle crashes are single vehicle, occurring on a rural road on a corner where the rider is going too fast for conditions.
* Alcohol was involved in 35.6 percent of motorcycle fatalities in 2008.
* The average age of motorcyclists killed in crashes in 2008 was 48.
* Non-endorsed motorcyclists were involved in 17 percent of motorcycle fatalities in 2008.

Post Tags: Oregon motorcycle laws, Senate Bill 546, TEAM OREGON, new Oregon motorcycle law
Blog Archive
2012
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2008
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec

Login or sign up to comment.

Comments
Bill Downey -Esquire. Well, you asked... January 29, 2010 10:58 AM
A basic rider course in British Columbia runs about $700, typically entails around 35 hours of instruction, isn't mandatory, and confers no insurance discount.The various major owners' groups (HOG, BMWMOA, GWRA etc) all offer quality rider training for peanuts.
What effective training does is dramatically sharpen students' awareness of what helps, and what kills. Here, as in most jurisdictions, intersection behaviour and exceeding skill level on rural roads are major contributors to injury and fatalities amongst motorcyclists. Note the "returning rider" age factor in the Oregon stats? Under skilled and over-confident.
The Course was worth every red cent of my $700, and a huge amount more; best money I ever spent. Anybody who figures their life isn't worth $200 or so really has some thinking to do. Obviously,Oregon's approach stills needs some tinkering to tie it more closely to the road safety science, but the central message is pretty clear: Do yourself a favour. Riding's way more fun on a bike than in a coffin.
Ryan Wright -duhh..... January 29, 2010 09:33 AM
Im all for having a BRC but think that the requirement by the state sets it up as a monopoly for certain businesses. There was a lady in my BRC, which i was required to take since i coundnt get my actual endorsment by the time BRC law was in Florida, who was barely able to hold up a 250 and dropped it 2x's in the class and passed. Now i am 24, have been riding motorcycles on the street for about 10 years (illegally of course) and overall been riding for about 16 years but am stuck was a course that is rudamentary and paying about 250 bucks to get my license. I think that BRC's should be optional for getting the license (getting it without DMV testing) but upon recieving a violation become required since you either lack experience or common sense to have recieved that ticket.

Another thing to look at is what is the age group of the fatalities and what were their speeds of travel and types of bikes. I have seen many motorcycle accidents, 2 were ditched cruisers and more than 10 sport bikes with people in my age group, where the layout was an indicator of speed or pulling wheelies
Dave Douglas -i need a title? January 26, 2010 06:52 PM
2 points: The ‘Team Oregon’ Basic Rider Training is a bargain. I would recommend it to everyone - makes safer riders for sure, for very few $. Oregon govt is not to be trusted. Their policies are more about revenue than protecting riders. These increases are about revenue. Ride on! -Dave

sc