Drag site icon to your taskbar to pin site.

Learn More
Shop Motorcycle Parts, Gear & Apparel at

House Looks to Ban 9.4 Million Acres in Utah

Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Utah Gold - Dual-Sport Travel in Moab
If a U.S. House subcommittee has its way, scenes like this from a dual sport adventure in Moab will be a thing of the past.
In a surprise move, the chairman of a U.S. House subcommittee has scheduled a hearing for next week on a proposal that would ban off-highway motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), and bicycles from more than 9 million acres of public land in Utah, the American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) reports.
 
The AMA is urging all riders to contact their U.S. representatives immediately to ask them to oppose the proposal, H.R. 1925, which is the America's Red Rock Wilderness Act of 2009. Concerned riders can contact their federal lawmakers by going to the Rights section of the AMA website at AmericanMotorcyclist.com and then clicking on the "Issues and Legislation" link.

While U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona, who is chairman of the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands, has yet to officially announce his intention to hold the hearing, the AMA has confirmed that H.R. 1925 will be considered on Thursday, Oct. 1.

The bill, introduced by U.S. Rep. Maurice Hinchey of New York, would ban motorized recreation on 9.4 million acres of public land in Utah by inappropriately designating it as Wilderness.

The devastating proposal would impact the Moab, San Rafael Swell and Chimney Rock riding areas, among others.
"The measure is totally unreasonable and completely unacceptable," said Ed Moreland, AMA vice president for government relations. "Continued responsible access to public lands is a vitally important right for current and future generations.

"This is just the latest step in a massive land grab being orchestrated nationwide by anti-access forces who are seeking to eliminate responsible off-highway riding on public lands by any means necessary," Moreland said. "They want to turn all public land into their own exclusive playground.

"It's important to note that this legislation would make sweeping changes to existing riding areas despite the fact that much of the land to be classified as Wilderness is already managed by federal agencies through local processes and decisions," Moreland added. "The best management of public lands is through local input, and the fact that a member of Congress from New York is proposing closing land in a state where none of that state's own representatives support the bill makes this measure even more unfair to those who live and recreate in Utah."

In 1964, Congress approved the National Wilderness Act that essentially set the criteria for designating land for Wilderness protection. That law was to preserve land that "generally appears to have been affected primarily by the force of nature, with the imprint of man's work substantially unnoticed."

The law led to a nationwide survey of public land to determine whether it should be designated as Wilderness. Since 1964, some 107 million acres nationwide have earned the designation.
 
"The AMA strongly supports properly designated Wilderness areas," Moreland said. "But anti-access opportunists who oppose off-highway riding are misapplying the intent of Wilderness as a means to push responsible riders off our nation's public lands. It is a disturbing trend that, if allowed to continue, may ultimately spell the demise of responsible motorized recreation on public lands. Indeed, as we speak, there are about a dozen Wilderness bills being considered on Capitol Hill that would close about 36 million acres to off-highway riding. It's patently unfair that so many appropriate off-highway riding areas are being taken away without additional new opportunities being introduced."
 
Earlier this year, Congress fast-tracked a bill with little public input that President Obama then signed into law to designate as Wilderness some 2 million acres in several states nationwide.

"So with the stroke of a pen, off-highway riding was banned forever, and even more public land is threatened now with closure," said Moreland.
 
All riders who want to take action on this matter can immediately contact their federal lawmakers by selecting the Issues and Legislation link in the Rights section of the AMA website at AmericanMotorcyclist.com. 
Dealer Locator

Login or sign up to comment.

Comments
Jerry Parker -Utah and all other states off road use  September 30, 2009 01:40 PM
I beleive wilderness act states areas that havent been desturbed or used by humans to be preserved. Most of these areas have been used by humanbeings for thousands of years, Also organized off road groups help maintaine these areas, I oppose any closure of these areas.
Shannon -Trackless?  September 30, 2009 12:44 AM
Trackless? I’ve been riding in the San Rafael Swell since 1980. The cliff’s, rock, and dirt are all still there. No erosion from existing trails managed by the BLM. The majority of the little trails have been closed down, but we (OHV enthusiasts) can still ride on the main dirt roads. If trackless is what it will become, then it should be just that, completely trackless. No hiking, biking, horseback riding, or ATVs. The BLM has done a good job of protecting the dirt hills and sage brush from reckless OHV use. The current administration, senators, and congressmen should look at the BLM’s progress so everyone can continue enjoying this beautiful area in their own responsible way. Southern Utah still looks beautiful after over 50 years of OHV use and BLM management. Let’s progress together with respect of each others’ love for the outdoors.

I encourage anyone who proposes this land grab (H.R. 1925) and similar proposals to become members of any type of organization like the Blue Ribbon Coalition. Also, contact your representative and tell them you oppose this as mentioned in the above article.

It’s sad that there are those people out there that can’t stay on designated trails. Anyone riding responsibly should approach those who don’t and tactfully explain the consequences of their actions. Most times they’ve never been educated. Also, if they continue, report them, take pictures, and get these suckers off their bikes. I’m in favor of huge fines for trail breakers, not in favor of senseless land grabs.

Finally, OHV registration provides millions of dollars for state budgets. Responsible OHV riders have our own heritage that should be considered and respected just as we try to respect conservationists’ views. Responsible OHV riding helps keep children & young adults active and out of mischief or trouble. Responsible and organized OHV riders do great things such as organizing fund raisers for hurt individuals and local communities, educating riders, and creating bridges and barriers to protect existing trails and to promote wildlife resource restoration.

Bill Chwala -Utah off road riding ban  September 28, 2009 08:14 PM
To those who want to see the ban imposed...what good is it if you will never be able to see these lands because you don't have time to hike 100 miles into the back country?? Don't you realize that your personal freedoms are being taken away little by little! Can't you see that probably 99% of the land in question will never see a track anyways simply because its too rugged to ride on!! Just look at the land...most of it is still there, untouched, even without some NY congressman sticking his nose in where it doesn't belong. Do you not realize that these congressmen are introducing this legislation by stealth and without public debate? Do you really favor your freedoms being taken away without people realizing it?? I think the AMA needs to get far more involved than it has. We need some opposition rallys going on across the country to raise funds to oppose this legislation. There are all kinds of rallys going on for other worthy causes, why not some rallys to raise funds ro oppose the greenies??? Lastly, everyone write their legislators to opposed these bills and do it now!!
Kendall -New York?  September 25, 2009 12:56 PM
While I feel like a number of trails should be closed and the areas should be managed to keep a large portion of these areas void of any motorized vehicles, I take issue with a congressman from New York trying to legislate in my state, Utah. 9 Million acres is a large blanket, one that the congressman from Utah should have more input in and a hand in drafting the legislation since they know much better how this will impact locals and local economies.
Charles Wagon -HR1925  September 24, 2009 03:09 PM
Let them close it off. We'll never see them in there ever again so it will in fact remain open to us after they decide there is something else they need to attack and move on. If I get a ticket so be it.
They closed off an area here in Montana to motorcycles leaving it open to horses and never seen hikers, then to our amazement they (a biologist with no public input)closed it off to horses. Something about the horses crossing the stream and putting silt in the fishies gills. No matter that the elk heards, bears, deer, etc. in there cross the streams too. Seriously these people have no clue what they are actually doing. Mentally disabled??
unclewill -Support this bill  September 24, 2009 10:40 AM
I own land in Moab and ride a street legal XR650L on designated roads throughout the Moab area. I also hike and backpack the wilderness areas of southern Utah. Designating wilderness does not restrict access, only the means of access. Roads will remain open to motor vehicles and roadless areas will remain open to non-mechanized uses. As OHVs become increasingly more capable to reach more inaccessible areas, we must preserve this country's disappearing western landscapes as our only means to connect with the wild. Actions such as these are never regretted in the long run.
michael white -moab  September 24, 2009 09:35 AM
and actually, in Moab lots of the original trails are now closed to motor vehicles. The world-famous Slickrock Trail being the most obvious example.
Michael White -Utah  September 24, 2009 09:32 AM
As a former longterm resident of Utah, I know the areas well, and understand why they should be protected. I love motorcycles, but hate to see priceless desert cut into and eroded, because some types of soils recover, and some don't. Those don't, and need to be protected. Hey, here in eastern North Carolina, where I live now, there's virtually no public lands at all.

The areas mentioned contained some of the most exquisite wilderness in the entire world. Not trying to protect it would be like using the Mona Lisa as a placemat.
Gritboy -Your tax dollars at work  September 24, 2009 08:41 AM
Doesn't seem to matter who's in office... the U.S. of f*ing A. just keeps getting more restricted by people who don't even understand what they're restricting. Strict usage rules and education proper safety and responsibility are what work -- look at Moab -- not locking spaces off. Equitable use and access by multiple interests/hobbies is what's fair to all parties. Oh wait, I'm expecting intelligence from our government!
Woodman West -HOPE AND CHANGE!  September 24, 2009 06:35 AM
Dis be Change I can belive in!!
CCrider77 -Tree Huggers - Get Bent!  September 23, 2009 10:16 PM
Greenies like Jack, mind your own damned business! Never mind the fact that an out-of-touch New York Representative can't possibly understand the heart, spirit, sovereignty and will of Utah residents, and that this would fly in the face of the wishes of the vast majority of Utah residents who live here. Utahns have had to deal with outsiders such as the Sierra Club, PETA and Greenpeace coming into their state to change their way of life and steal their livelihoods, opportunities and recreation for years. Nothing new. These trails, many of which originated as mule and Jeep trails going back decades to the 30's, 40's and 50's, which afford access to Utah's rugged beauty have been a part of Utah's history, heritage and economy and should remain open to all. People who have never lived in Utah, listen up! If you want to enjoy Utah's natural beauty - come here, enjoy it and leave. You can buy a postcard if you want. However DO NOT tell Utah residents how to manage their resources and lives. If you want to poke your nose in other people's business, do so in your own state or country.
Wes -Off Highway riding in Utah  September 23, 2009 08:21 PM
I live in georgia and the only way I would ever go to utah would to be able to ride the trails in this area. Other than that I have no intrest in the state whatsoever. How are people going to appreciate this area if you cant even go there. You can't even see pictures from the area unless you or someone else goes there on some sort of ohv to take the pictures. I agree 100% with wildlife conservation but 9.4 millon acreas? What is the government going to do with that much land? I'm sure they have something up thier sleave to make us tax paying americans pay taxes on it one way or another and still not be able to enjoy it.



Colorado Man -SOB's  September 23, 2009 07:26 PM
New York Libs deciding what to do in Utah, WTF. Go climb the Empire State Building you commies! 322
Ron Ramsey -Balance  September 23, 2009 06:42 PM
Access and use of all public lands needs to be balanced with the needs of all outdoor users. This is obviously a land grab by the enviromental extremists who have turned their worship of the planet to a new religion. Respect for the land and planet...yes...worship as a deity...NO . Jack..get out of the cult while you can!!!

With Love, Roc Rat
Dave Amiss -dems  September 23, 2009 05:08 PM
This is what you get when you vote demacrats in.
Tami -Off highway riding should be allowed!  September 23, 2009 04:53 PM
Remember the 1960's. The trails around Moab were established back then, yes, most of them by off-road vehicles. For forty plus years, we haven't seen the wilderness around Moab deteriorate due to this, in fact, it helps boost tourism for Utah with many family vacations. Believe or not, I don't ride an off road vehicle in Utah, only a mountain bike, however, stop being selfish and let everyone enjoy the beauty of Utah from whatever angle they want! It won't ruin Utah's landscape.
Jack Romanski -Off-highway riding in Utah  September 23, 2009 04:35 PM
This part of the world should stay trackless. I favor the banning of off-road vehicles from it. My representative is for HR 1925, and so should yours be. I love Utah.

Email Newsletter
Sign-up for our weekly update.
MotoUSA Mobile
Optimized for your device.
Motorcycle Superstore
Shop with confidence - #1 rated.

Motorcycle USA covers the world of motorcycles with breaking motorcycle news, motorcycle reviews and motorcycle race coverage. When you can’t afford to miss a single event in the world of motorcycling, trust Motorcycle USA to bring you the inside scoop on the two-wheeled world.


Copyright 1996-2012 Motorcycle USA, LLC. All rights reserved.


sc